Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] mm: jit/text allocator

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
This is embarrassing, but these patches were from a wrong branch :( Please ignore. On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 05:25:43PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > Hi, > > The patches are also available in git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/lin

[PATCH RESEND v8 16/16] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" BPF just-in-time compiler depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it used module_alloc() to allocate memory for the generated code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, drop dependency of CONFIG_BPF_JIT on CONFIG_MODULES and make

[PATCH RESEND v8 15/16] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be enabled in non-modular kernels. Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes insi

[PATCH RESEND v8 14/16] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropriate

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" There are places where CONFIG_MODULES guards the code that depends on memory allocation being done with module_alloc(). Replace CONFIG_MODULES with CONFIG_EXECMEM in such places. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/powerpc/Kconfig

[PATCH RESEND v8 13/16] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Dynamic ftrace must allocate memory for code and this was impossible without CONFIG_MODULES. With execmem separated from the modules code, execmem_text_alloc() is available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES. Remove dependency of dynamic ftrace on CONFIG_MODULE

[PATCH RESEND v8 12/16] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" execmem does not depend on modules, on the contrary modules use execmem. To make execmem available when CONFIG_MODULES=n, for instance for kprobes, split execmem_params initialization out from arch/*/kernel/module.c and compile it when CONFIG_EXECMEM=y

[PATCH RESEND v8 11/16] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" powerpc overrides kprobes::alloc_insn_page() to remove writable permissions when STRICT_MODULE_RWX is on. Add definition of EXECMEM_KRPOBES to execmem_params to allow using the generic kprobes::alloc_insn_page() with the desired permissions. As po

[PATCH RESEND v8 10/16] arm64: extend execmem_info for generated code allocations

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on arm64 can be placed anywhere in vmalloc address space and currently this is implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec() in arm64. Define EXECMEM_KPROBES and EXECMEM_BPF range

[PATCH RESEND v8 09/16] riscv: extend execmem_params for generated code allocations

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on RISC-V are not placed in the modules area and these custom allocations are implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec(). Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and V

[PATCH RESEND v8 08/16] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Extend execmem parameters to accommodate more complex overrides of module_alloc() by architectures. This includes specification of a fallback range required by arm, arm64 and powerpc, EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA type required by powerpc, support for allocatio

[PATCH RESEND v8 07/16] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Several architectures override module_alloc() only to define address range for code allocations different than VMALLOC address space. Provide a generic implementation in execmem that uses the parameters for address space ranges, required alignmen

[PATCH RESEND v8 06/16] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code. Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and puts the burden of code

[PATCH RESEND v8 05/16] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Move the logic related to the memory allocation and freeing into module_memory_alloc() and module_memory_free(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- kernel/module/main.c | 64 +++--

[PATCH RESEND v8 04/16] sparc: simplify module_alloc()

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_END for 32-bit and reduce module_alloc() to __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, ...) as with the new defines the allocations becomes identical for both 32 a

[PATCH RESEND v8 03/16] nios2: define virtual address space for modules

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" nios2 uses kmalloc() to implement module_alloc() because CALL26/PCREL26 cannot reach all of vmalloc address space. Define module space as 32MiB below the kernel base and switch nios2 to use vmalloc for module allocations. Suggested-by: Thomas Gleix

[PATCH RESEND v8 02/16] mips: module: rename MODULE_START to MODULES_VADDR

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" and MODULE_END to MODULES_END to match other architectures that define custom address space for modules. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 4 ++-- arch/mips/kernel/module.c | 4 ++-- arch/mips/

[PATCH RESEND v8 01/16] arm64: module: remove unneeded call to kasan_alloc_module_shadow()

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Since commit f6f37d9320a1 ("arm64: select KASAN_VMALLOC for SW/HW_TAGS modes") KASAN_VMALLOC is always enabled when KASAN is on. This means that allocations in module_alloc() will be tracked by KASAN protection for vmalloc() and that kasan

[PATCH RESEND v8 00/16] mm: jit/text allocator

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Hi, The patches are also available in git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v8 v8: * fix intialization of default_execmem_info v7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240429121620.1186447-1-r...@kernel.org * defi

[PATCH v8 17/17] fixup: convert remaining archs: defaults handling

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- mm/execmem.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/execmem.c b/mm/execmem.c index f6dc3fabc1ca..0c4b36bc6d10 100644 --- a/mm/execmem.c +++ b/mm/execmem.c @@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ static void __init __ex

[PATCH v8 16/17] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" BPF just-in-time compiler depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it used module_alloc() to allocate memory for the generated code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, drop dependency of CONFIG_BPF_JIT on CONFIG_MODULES and make

[PATCH v8 15/17] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be enabled in non-modular kernels. Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes insi

[PATCH v8 14/17] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropriate

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" There are places where CONFIG_MODULES guards the code that depends on memory allocation being done with module_alloc(). Replace CONFIG_MODULES with CONFIG_EXECMEM in such places. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/powerpc/Kconfig

[PATCH v8 13/17] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Dynamic ftrace must allocate memory for code and this was impossible without CONFIG_MODULES. With execmem separated from the modules code, execmem_text_alloc() is available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES. Remove dependency of dynamic ftrace on CONFIG_MODULE

[PATCH v8 12/17] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" execmem does not depend on modules, on the contrary modules use execmem. To make execmem available when CONFIG_MODULES=n, for instance for kprobes, split execmem_params initialization out from arch/*/kernel/module.c and compile it when CONFIG_EXECMEM=y

[PATCH v8 11/17] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" powerpc overrides kprobes::alloc_insn_page() to remove writable permissions when STRICT_MODULE_RWX is on. Add definition of EXECMEM_KRPOBES to execmem_params to allow using the generic kprobes::alloc_insn_page() with the desired permissions. As po

[PATCH v8 10/17] arm64: extend execmem_info for generated code allocations

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on arm64 can be placed anywhere in vmalloc address space and currently this is implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec() in arm64. Define EXECMEM_KPROBES and EXECMEM_BPF range

[PATCH v8 09/17] riscv: extend execmem_params for generated code allocations

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on RISC-V are not placed in the modules area and these custom allocations are implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec(). Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and V

[PATCH v8 08/17] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Extend execmem parameters to accommodate more complex overrides of module_alloc() by architectures. This includes specification of a fallback range required by arm, arm64 and powerpc, EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA type required by powerpc, support for allocatio

[PATCH v8 07/17] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Several architectures override module_alloc() only to define address range for code allocations different than VMALLOC address space. Provide a generic implementation in execmem that uses the parameters for address space ranges, required alignmen

[PATCH v8 06/17] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code. Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and puts the burden of code

[PATCH v8 05/17] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Move the logic related to the memory allocation and freeing into module_memory_alloc() and module_memory_free(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- kernel/module/main.c | 64 +++--

[PATCH v8 04/17] sparc: simplify module_alloc()

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_END for 32-bit and reduce module_alloc() to __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, ...) as with the new defines the allocations becomes identical for both 32 a

[PATCH v8 03/17] nios2: define virtual address space for modules

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" nios2 uses kmalloc() to implement module_alloc() because CALL26/PCREL26 cannot reach all of vmalloc address space. Define module space as 32MiB below the kernel base and switch nios2 to use vmalloc for module allocations. Suggested-by: Thomas Gleix

[PATCH v8 02/17] mips: module: rename MODULE_START to MODULES_VADDR

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" and MODULE_END to MODULES_END to match other architectures that define custom address space for modules. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 4 ++-- arch/mips/kernel/module.c | 4 ++-- arch/mips/

[PATCH v8 01/17] arm64: module: remove unneeded call to kasan_alloc_module_shadow()

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Since commit f6f37d9320a1 ("arm64: select KASAN_VMALLOC for SW/HW_TAGS modes") KASAN_VMALLOC is always enabled when KASAN is on. This means that allocations in module_alloc() will be tracked by KASAN protection for vmalloc() and that kasan

[PATCH v8 00/17] mm: jit/text allocator

2024-05-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Hi, The patches are also available in git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v8 v8: * fix intialization of default_execmem_info v7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240429121620.1186447-1-r...@kernel.org * defi

Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] mm: jit/text allocator

2024-05-03 Thread Mike Rapoport
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 03:16:04PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > The patches are also available in git: > &g

[PATCH v7 16/16] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" BPF just-in-time compiler depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it used module_alloc() to allocate memory for the generated code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, drop dependency of CONFIG_BPF_JIT on CONFIG_MODULES and make

[PATCH v7 15/16] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be enabled in non-modular kernels. Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes insi

[PATCH v7 14/16] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropriate

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" There are places where CONFIG_MODULES guards the code that depends on memory allocation being done with module_alloc(). Replace CONFIG_MODULES with CONFIG_EXECMEM in such places. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/powerpc/Kconfig

[PATCH v7 13/16] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Dynamic ftrace must allocate memory for code and this was impossible without CONFIG_MODULES. With execmem separated from the modules code, execmem_text_alloc() is available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES. Remove dependency of dynamic ftrace on CONFIG_MODULE

[PATCH v7 12/16] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" execmem does not depend on modules, on the contrary modules use execmem. To make execmem available when CONFIG_MODULES=n, for instance for kprobes, split execmem_params initialization out from arch/*/kernel/module.c and compile it when CONFIG_EXECMEM=y

[PATCH v7 11/16] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" powerpc overrides kprobes::alloc_insn_page() to remove writable permissions when STRICT_MODULE_RWX is on. Add definition of EXECMEM_KRPOBES to execmem_params to allow using the generic kprobes::alloc_insn_page() with the desired permissions. As po

[PATCH v7 10/16] arm64: extend execmem_info for generated code allocations

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on arm64 can be placed anywhere in vmalloc address space and currently this is implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec() in arm64. Define EXECMEM_KPROBES and EXECMEM_BPF range

[PATCH v7 09/16] riscv: extend execmem_params for generated code allocations

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on RISC-V are not placed in the modules area and these custom allocations are implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec(). Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and V

[PATCH v7 08/16] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Extend execmem parameters to accommodate more complex overrides of module_alloc() by architectures. This includes specification of a fallback range required by arm, arm64 and powerpc, EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA type required by powerpc, support for allocatio

[PATCH v7 07/16] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Several architectures override module_alloc() only to define address range for code allocations different than VMALLOC address space. Provide a generic implementation in execmem that uses the parameters for address space ranges, required alignmen

[PATCH v7 06/16] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code. Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and puts the burden of code

[PATCH v7 05/16] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Move the logic related to the memory allocation and freeing into module_memory_alloc() and module_memory_free(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- kernel/module/main.c | 64 +++- 1 file changed, 39 inserti

[PATCH v7 04/16] sparc: simplify module_alloc()

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_END for 32-bit and reduce module_alloc() to __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, ...) as with the new defines the allocations becomes identical for both 32 a

[PATCH v7 03/16] nios2: define virtual address space for modules

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" nios2 uses kmalloc() to implement module_alloc() because CALL26/PCREL26 cannot reach all of vmalloc address space. Define module space as 32MiB below the kernel base and switch nios2 to use vmalloc for module allocations. Suggested-by: Thomas Gleix

[PATCH v7 02/16] mips: module: rename MODULE_START to MODULES_VADDR

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" and MODULE_END to MODULES_END to match other architectures that define custom address space for modules. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 4 ++-- arch/mips/kernel/module.c | 4 ++-- arch/mips/

[PATCH v7 01/16] arm64: module: remove unneeded call to kasan_alloc_module_shadow()

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Since commit f6f37d9320a1 ("arm64: select KASAN_VMALLOC for SW/HW_TAGS modes") KASAN_VMALLOC is always enabled when KASAN is on. This means that allocations in module_alloc() will be tracked by KASAN protection for vmalloc() and that kasan

[PATCH v7 00/16] mm: jit/text allocator

2024-04-29 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Hi, The patches are also available in git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v7 v7 changes: * define MODULE_{VADDR,END} for riscv32 to fix the build and avoid #ifdefs in a function body * add Acks, thanks eve

Re: [PATCH v6 08/16] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-28 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:01:34PM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:30 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" > > > > Extend execmem parameters to accommodate more complex overrides of > > module_alloc() by archite

[PATCH v6 16/16] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" BPF just-in-time compiler depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it used module_alloc() to allocate memory for the generated code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, drop dependency of CONFIG_BPF_JIT on CONFIG_MODULES and make

[PATCH v6 15/16] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be enabled in non-modular kernels. Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes insi

[PATCH v6 14/16] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropriate

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" There are places where CONFIG_MODULES guards the code that depends on memory allocation being done with module_alloc(). Replace CONFIG_MODULES with CONFIG_EXECMEM in such places. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/powerpc/Kconfig

[PATCH v6 13/16] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Dynamic ftrace must allocate memory for code and this was impossible without CONFIG_MODULES. With execmem separated from the modules code, execmem_text_alloc() is available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES. Remove dependency of dynamic ftrace on CONFIG_MODULE

[PATCH v6 12/16] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" execmem does not depend on modules, on the contrary modules use execmem. To make execmem available when CONFIG_MODULES=n, for instance for kprobes, split execmem_params initialization out from arch/*/kernel/module.c and compile it when CONFIG_EXECMEM=y

[PATCH v6 11/16] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" powerpc overrides kprobes::alloc_insn_page() to remove writable permissions when STRICT_MODULE_RWX is on. Add definition of EXECMEM_KRPOBES to execmem_params to allow using the generic kprobes::alloc_insn_page() with the desired permissions. As po

[PATCH v6 10/16] arm64: extend execmem_info for generated code allocations

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on arm64 can be placed anywhere in vmalloc address space and currently this is implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec() in arm64. Define EXECMEM_KPROBES and EXECMEM_BPF range

[PATCH v6 09/16] riscv: extend execmem_params for generated code allocations

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on RISC-V are not placed in the modules area and these custom allocations are implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec(). Slightly reorder execmem_params initialization to suppo

[PATCH v6 08/16] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Extend execmem parameters to accommodate more complex overrides of module_alloc() by architectures. This includes specification of a fallback range required by arm, arm64 and powerpc, EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA type required by powerpc, support for allocatio

[PATCH v6 07/16] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Several architectures override module_alloc() only to define address range for code allocations different than VMALLOC address space. Provide a generic implementation in execmem that uses the parameters for address space ranges, required alignmen

[PATCH v6 06/16] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code. Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and puts the burden of code

[PATCH v6 05/16] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Move the logic related to the memory allocation and freeing into module_memory_alloc() and module_memory_free(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- kernel/module/main.c | 64 +++- 1 file changed, 39 inserti

[PATCH v6 04/16] sparc: simplify module_alloc()

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_END for 32-bit and reduce module_alloc() to __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, ...) as with the new defines the allocations becomes identical for both 32 a

[PATCH v6 03/16] nios2: define virtual address space for modules

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" nios2 uses kmalloc() to implement module_alloc() because CALL26/PCREL26 cannot reach all of vmalloc address space. Define module space as 32MiB below the kernel base and switch nios2 to use vmalloc for module allocations. Suggested-by: Thomas Gleix

[PATCH v6 02/16] mips: module: rename MODULE_START to MODULES_VADDR

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" and MODULE_END to MODULES_END to match other architectures that define custom address space for modules. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 4 ++-- arch/mips/kernel/module.c | 4 ++-- arch/mips/

[PATCH v6 01/16] arm64: module: remove unneeded call to kasan_alloc_module_shadow()

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Since commit f6f37d9320a1 ("arm64: select KASAN_VMALLOC for SW/HW_TAGS modes") KASAN_VMALLOC is always enabled when KASAN is on. This means that allocations in module_alloc() will be tracked by KASAN protection for vmalloc() and that kasan

[PATCH v6 00/16] mm: jit/text allocator

2024-04-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Hi, The patches are also available in git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v6 v6 changes: * restore patch "arm64: extend execmem_info for generated code allocations" that disappeared in v5 reb

[PATCH v5 15/15] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" BPF just-in-time compiler depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it used module_alloc() to allocate memory for the generated code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, drop dependency of CONFIG_BPF_JIT on CONFIG_MODULES and make

[PATCH v5 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be enabled in non-modular kernels. Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes insi

[PATCH v5 13/15] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropriate

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" There are places where CONFIG_MODULES guards the code that depends on memory allocation being done with module_alloc(). Replace CONFIG_MODULES with CONFIG_EXECMEM in such places. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/powerpc/Kconfig

[PATCH v5 12/15] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Dynamic ftrace must allocate memory for code and this was impossible without CONFIG_MODULES. With execmem separated from the modules code, execmem_text_alloc() is available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES. Remove dependency of dynamic ftrace on CONFIG_MODULE

[PATCH v5 11/15] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" execmem does not depend on modules, on the contrary modules use execmem. To make execmem available when CONFIG_MODULES=n, for instance for kprobes, split execmem_params initialization out from arch/*/kernel/module.c and compile it when CONFIG_EXECMEM=y

[PATCH v5 10/15] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" powerpc overrides kprobes::alloc_insn_page() to remove writable permissions when STRICT_MODULE_RWX is on. Add definition of EXECMEM_KRPOBES to execmem_params to allow using the generic kprobes::alloc_insn_page() with the desired permissions. As po

[PATCH v5 09/15] riscv: extend execmem_params for generated code allocations

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on RISC-V are not placed in the modules area and these custom allocations are implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec(). Slightly reorder execmem_params initialization to suppo

[PATCH v5 08/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Extend execmem parameters to accommodate more complex overrides of module_alloc() by architectures. This includes specification of a fallback range required by arm, arm64 and powerpc, EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA type required by powerpc, support for allocatio

[PATCH v5 07/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Several architectures override module_alloc() only to define address range for code allocations different than VMALLOC address space. Provide a generic implementation in execmem that uses the parameters for address space ranges, required alignmen

[PATCH v5 06/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code. Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and puts the burden of code

[PATCH v5 05/15] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Move the logic related to the memory allocation and freeing into module_memory_alloc() and module_memory_free(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- kernel/module/main.c | 64 +++- 1 file changed, 39 inserti

[PATCH v5 04/15] sparc: simplify module_alloc()

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_END for 32-bit and reduce module_alloc() to __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, ...) as with the new defines the allocations becames identical for both 32 a

[PATCH v5 03/15] nios2: define virtual address space for modules

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" nios2 uses kmalloc() to implement module_alloc() because CALL26/PCREL26 cannot reach all of vmalloc address space. Define module space as 32MiB below the kernel base and switch nios2 to use vmalloc for module allocations. Suggested-by: Thomas Gleix

[PATCH v5 02/15] mips: module: rename MODULE_START to MODULES_VADDR

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" and MODULE_END to MODULES_END to match other architectures that define custom address space for modules. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 4 ++-- arch/mips/kernel/module.c | 4 ++-- arch/mips/

[PATCH v5 01/15] arm64: module: remove unneeded call to kasan_alloc_module_shadow()

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Since commit f6f37d9320a1 ("arm64: select KASAN_VMALLOC for SW/HW_TAGS modes") KASAN_VMALLOC is always enabled when KASAN is on. This means that allocations in module_alloc() will be tracked by KASAN protection for vmalloc() and that kasan

[PATCH v5 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" (something went wrong with the prevois posting, sorry for the noise) Hi, Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than having a struct describing ar

[PATCH v5 15/15] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" BPF just-in-time compiler depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it used module_alloc() to allocate memory for the generated code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, drop dependency of CONFIG_BPF_JIT on CONFIG_MODULES and make

[PATCH v5 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for code. Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be enabled in non-modular kernels. Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes insi

[PATCH v5 13/15] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropriate

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" There are places where CONFIG_MODULES guards the code that depends on memory allocation being done with module_alloc(). Replace CONFIG_MODULES with CONFIG_EXECMEM in such places. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- arch/powerpc/Kconfig

[PATCH v5 12/15] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Dynamic ftrace must allocate memory for code and this was impossible without CONFIG_MODULES. With execmem separated from the modules code, execmem_text_alloc() is available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES. Remove dependency of dynamic ftrace on CONFIG_MODULE

[PATCH v5 11/15] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" execmem does not depend on modules, on the contrary modules use execmem. To make execmem available when CONFIG_MODULES=n, for instance for kprobes, split execmem_params initialization out from arch/*/kernel/module.c and compile it when CONFIG_EXECMEM=y

[PATCH v5 10/15] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" powerpc overrides kprobes::alloc_insn_page() to remove writable permissions when STRICT_MODULE_RWX is on. Add definition of EXECMEM_KRPOBES to execmem_params to allow using the generic kprobes::alloc_insn_page() with the desired permissions. As po

[PATCH v5 09/15] riscv: extend execmem_params for generated code allocations

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" The memory allocations for kprobes and BPF on RISC-V are not placed in the modules area and these custom allocations are implemented with overrides of alloc_insn_page() and bpf_jit_alloc_exec(). Slightly reorder execmem_params initialization to suppo

[PATCH v5 08/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Extend execmem parameters to accommodate more complex overrides of module_alloc() by architectures. This includes specification of a fallback range required by arm, arm64 and powerpc, EXECMEM_MODULE_DATA type required by powerpc, support for allocatio

[PATCH v5 07/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Several architectures override module_alloc() only to define address range for code allocations different than VMALLOC address space. Provide a generic implementation in execmem that uses the parameters for address space ranges, required alignmen

[PATCH v5 06/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" module_alloc() is used everywhere as a mean to allocate memory for code. Beside being semantically wrong, this unnecessarily ties all subsystems that need to allocate code, such as ftrace, kprobes and BPF to modules and puts the burden of code

[PATCH v5 05/15] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Move the logic related to the memory allocation and freeing into module_memory_alloc() and module_memory_free(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- kernel/module/main.c | 64 +++- 1 file changed, 39 inserti

[PATCH v5 04/15] sparc: simplify module_alloc()

2024-04-22 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" Define MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END as VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_END for 32-bit and reduce module_alloc() to __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, ...) as with the new defines the allocations becames identical for both 32 a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >