Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 12 February 2008 21:04:06 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>> And you just copied the real bug in that logic as well:
>>>
>>> set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, size);
>> Oops you're right. I wanted to fix that, but
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2008 21:04:06 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> >
> > And you just copied the real bug in that logic as well:
> >
> > set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, size);
>
> Oops you're right. I wanted to fix that, but didn't. Ok I'll put up
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 21:04:06 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> And you just copied the real bug in that logic as well:
>
> set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, size);
Oops you're right. I wanted to fix that, but didn't. Ok I'll put up
my brown paper back tonight when I go out.
>
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >From code review the EFI memory map handling has a couple of problems:
>
> - The test for _WB memory was reversed so it would set cache able memory
> to uncached
> - It would always set a wrong uninitialized zero address to uncached
> (so I suspect it
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 21:04:06 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
And you just copied the real bug in that logic as well:
set_memory_uc(md-virt_addr, size);
Oops you're right. I wanted to fix that, but didn't. Ok I'll put up
my brown
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
From code review the EFI memory map handling has a couple of problems:
- The test for _WB memory was reversed so it would set cache able memory
to uncached
- It would always set a wrong uninitialized zero address to uncached
(so I suspect it always
>From code review the EFI memory map handling has a couple of problems:
- The test for _WB memory was reversed so it would set cache able memory
to uncached
- It would always set a wrong uninitialized zero address to uncached
(so I suspect it always set the first few pages in phys memory to
From code review the EFI memory map handling has a couple of problems:
- The test for _WB memory was reversed so it would set cache able memory
to uncached
- It would always set a wrong uninitialized zero address to uncached
(so I suspect it always set the first few pages in phys memory to
8 matches
Mail list logo
