On 06/20/2014 09:14 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
[...]
> Tried this v2 and it seems to do the trick! My panel switches on as expected.
Thanks. I posted a formal patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4391271/ -> might want to add
tested/reviewed/ack on that thread. I hope I got your email ID
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 08:23-20140620, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> + l-o,
>> http://marc.info/?t=14031642754=1=2 full thread
>>
>> Minor change in subject to indicate palmas regulator fail
>>
>> On 18:49-20140620, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> > On
On 08:23-20140620, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> + l-o,
> http://marc.info/?t=14031642754=1=2 full thread
>
> Minor change in subject to indicate palmas regulator fail
>
> On 18:49-20140620, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > On 06/20/2014 06:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > >* PGP Signed by an
+ l-o,
http://marc.info/?t=14031642754=1=2 full thread
Minor change in subject to indicate palmas regulator fail
On 18:49-20140620, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On 06/20/2014 06:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >* PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:44:46PM +0900,
On 06/20/2014 07:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:26:43PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
So I can see three questions here:
1) Why does _regulator_enable() on vdd_1v8 return 0 while everything
suggests that it is enabled (this regulator
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:26:43PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> So I can see three questions here:
> 1) Why does _regulator_enable() on vdd_1v8 return 0 while everything
> suggests that it is enabled (this regulator powers lot of devices, like
> eMMC, which are working fine). This may be an
On 06/20/2014 06:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:44:46PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
dbabd624d
regulator: palmas: Reemove open coded functions with helper functions
Keerthy, Nishanth, could it be that there is still something wrong
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:44:46PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> dbabd624d
> regulator: palmas: Reemove open coded functions with helper functions
> Keerthy, Nishanth, could it be that there is still something wrong with the
> REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE() definitions?
> This seems to be the
On 06/20/2014 02:26 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On 06/20/2014 02:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:59:04AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/19/2014 01:49 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Remove the regulator-always-on property from some
On 06/20/2014 02:26 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On 06/20/2014 02:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:59:04AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/19/2014 01:49 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Remove the regulator-always-on property from some
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:44:46PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
dbabd624d
regulator: palmas: Reemove open coded functions with helper functions
Keerthy, Nishanth, could it be that there is still something wrong with the
REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE() definitions?
This seems to be the cause
On 06/20/2014 06:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:44:46PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
dbabd624d
regulator: palmas: Reemove open coded functions with helper functions
Keerthy, Nishanth, could it be that there is still something wrong
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:26:43PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
So I can see three questions here:
1) Why does _regulator_enable() on vdd_1v8 return 0 while everything
suggests that it is enabled (this regulator powers lot of devices, like
eMMC, which are working fine). This may be an
On 06/20/2014 07:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:26:43PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
So I can see three questions here:
1) Why does _regulator_enable() on vdd_1v8 return 0 while everything
suggests that it is enabled (this regulator
+ l-o,
http://marc.info/?t=14031642754r=1w=2 full thread
Minor change in subject to indicate palmas regulator fail
On 18:49-20140620, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On 06/20/2014 06:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:44:46PM +0900,
On 08:23-20140620, Nishanth Menon wrote:
+ l-o,
http://marc.info/?t=14031642754r=1w=2 full thread
Minor change in subject to indicate palmas regulator fail
On 18:49-20140620, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On 06/20/2014 06:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On 08:23-20140620, Nishanth Menon wrote:
+ l-o,
http://marc.info/?t=14031642754r=1w=2 full thread
Minor change in subject to indicate palmas regulator fail
On 18:49-20140620, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On
On 06/20/2014 09:14 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
[...]
Tried this v2 and it seems to do the trick! My panel switches on as expected.
Thanks. I posted a formal patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4391271/ - might want to add
tested/reviewed/ack on that thread. I hope I got your email ID
On 06/20/2014 02:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:59:04AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/19/2014 01:49 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Remove the regulator-always-on property from some regulators that do not
need it. On recent kernels fixed
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:59:04AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/19/2014 01:49 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > Remove the regulator-always-on property from some regulators that do not
> > need it. On recent kernels fixed regulators which supply is always on
> > fail registration.
> That
On 06/19/2014 01:49 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Remove the regulator-always-on property from some regulators that do not
> need it. On recent kernels fixed regulators which supply is always on
> fail registration.
That sounds like a bug in the regulator core, which should be fixed there.
Remove the regulator-always-on property from some regulators that do not
need it. On recent kernels fixed regulators which supply is always on
fail registration.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot
---
Stephen, do you think you could queue this for 3.16-rc2 or 3? Without
this the TN7 panel does not
Remove the regulator-always-on property from some regulators that do not
need it. On recent kernels fixed regulators which supply is always on
fail registration.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot acour...@nvidia.com
---
Stephen, do you think you could queue this for 3.16-rc2 or 3? Without
this the
On 06/19/2014 01:49 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Remove the regulator-always-on property from some regulators that do not
need it. On recent kernels fixed regulators which supply is always on
fail registration.
That sounds like a bug in the regulator core, which should be fixed there.
After
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:59:04AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/19/2014 01:49 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Remove the regulator-always-on property from some regulators that do not
need it. On recent kernels fixed regulators which supply is always on
fail registration.
That sounds
On 06/20/2014 02:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:59:04AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/19/2014 01:49 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Remove the regulator-always-on property from some regulators that do not
need it. On recent kernels fixed
26 matches
Mail list logo
