On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 02:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > > > Bryan Wu wrote:
> > > > >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 02:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > > Bryan Wu wrote:
> > > >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> > > >>> Could you check the
On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > Bryan Wu wrote:
> > >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> > >>> Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
> > >>> to be
On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Bryan Wu wrote:
but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
to be implemented for no-mmu?
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 02:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Bryan Wu wrote:
but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
Could you check the rest of these over to
On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 02:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Bryan Wu wrote:
but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Bryan Wu wrote:
> >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> >>> Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
> >>> to be implemented for no-mmu?
> >> you're right we want mremap, my
Bryan Wu wrote:
but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
to be implemented for no-mmu?
you're right we want mremap, my fault
Yes, I do think so, both sys_mremap and sys_munmap are implemented in
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 04:37 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 9/13/07, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> > > +/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
> >
> > I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
> > of
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:18:52AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> > +/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
>
> I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
> of them. mbind makes sense (it's only implemented for NUMA ...
On 9/13/07, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> > +/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
>
> I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
> of them. mbind makes sense (it's only implemented for NUMA ... a NUMA
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> +/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
of them. mbind makes sense (it's only implemented for NUMA ... a NUMA
embedded platform? not the kind which runs applications that use
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:07:01PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> > +#define __NR_syscall 354
> > #define NR_syscalls__NR_syscall
> >
> Err, why did you change __NR_syscall? This is going to break the ABI for
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> @@ -352,9 +353,54 @@
> #define __NR_shmdt 340
> #define __NR_shmget 341
>
> -#define __NR_syscall 342
> +#define __NR_splice 342
> +#define __NR_sync_file_range 343
> +#define __NR_tee
When compiling the Blackfin kernel, checksyscalls.pl will report lots of
missing syscalls warnings.
This patch will add some missing syscalls which make sense on Blackfin arch.
Also add ignored syscall list to kill remaining warnings.
After appling this patch, toolchain should be rebuilt. Then
When compiling the Blackfin kernel, checksyscalls.pl will report lots of
missing syscalls warnings.
This patch will add some missing syscalls which make sense on Blackfin arch.
Also add ignored syscall list to kill remaining warnings.
After appling this patch, toolchain should be rebuilt. Then
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
@@ -352,9 +353,54 @@
#define __NR_shmdt 340
#define __NR_shmget 341
-#define __NR_syscall 342
+#define __NR_splice 342
+#define __NR_sync_file_range 343
+#define __NR_tee 344
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:07:01PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
+#define __NR_syscall 354
#define NR_syscalls__NR_syscall
Err, why did you change __NR_syscall? This is going to break the ABI for
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
+/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
of them. mbind makes sense (it's only implemented for NUMA ... a NUMA
embedded platform? not the kind which runs applications that use
On 9/13/07, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
+/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
of them. mbind makes sense (it's only implemented for NUMA ... a NUMA
embedded
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:18:52AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
+/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
of them. mbind makes sense (it's only implemented for NUMA ... a NUMA
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 04:37 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 9/13/07, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:56:43PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
+/* Not relevant on no-mmu */
I thought this list seemed a little long, so I investigated a couple
of them. mbind
Bryan Wu wrote:
but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
to be implemented for no-mmu?
you're right we want mremap, my fault
Yes, I do think so, both sys_mremap and sys_munmap are implemented in
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Bryan Wu wrote:
but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
to be implemented for no-mmu?
you're right we want mremap, my fault
24 matches
Mail list logo
