Re: Emulating level IRQs (was: Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN)

2012-07-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:01:56PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 23.07.2012 18:51, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hmm, but that would mean we need to restore reading the data in open() > > to make sure we re-arm IRQ in case somebody touched the screen before it > > was opened by userspace... > I

Emulating level IRQs (was: Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN)

2012-07-24 Thread Daniel Mack
On 23.07.2012 18:51, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:36:12PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: >> Ok, finally I found some time. In general, the patch works fine. The >> only detail I had to amend was the irqflags, which were changed from >> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING/IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING to

Emulating level IRQs (was: Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN)

2012-07-24 Thread Daniel Mack
On 23.07.2012 18:51, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:36:12PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: Ok, finally I found some time. In general, the patch works fine. The only detail I had to amend was the irqflags, which were changed from IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING/IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING to

Re: Emulating level IRQs (was: Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN)

2012-07-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:01:56PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: On 23.07.2012 18:51, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hmm, but that would mean we need to restore reading the data in open() to make sure we re-arm IRQ in case somebody touched the screen before it was opened by userspace... I had

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-23 Thread Daniel Mack
On 23.07.2012 18:51, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:36:12PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: >> Ok, finally I found some time. In general, the patch works fine. The >> only detail I had to amend was the irqflags, which were changed from >> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING/IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING to

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-23 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:36:12PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 17.07.2012 14:59, Daniel Mack wrote: > > On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >>> Hi Sven, > >>> > >>> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-23 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:36:12PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: On 17.07.2012 14:59, Daniel Mack wrote: On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi Sven, On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi,

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-23 Thread Daniel Mack
On 23.07.2012 18:51, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:36:12PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: Ok, finally I found some time. In general, the patch works fine. The only detail I had to amend was the irqflags, which were changed from IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING/IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING to

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-19 Thread Daniel Mack
On 17.07.2012 14:59, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>> Hi Sven, >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-19 Thread Daniel Mack
On 17.07.2012 14:59, Daniel Mack wrote: On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi Sven, On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-17 Thread Daniel Mack
On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> Hi Sven, >> >> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:40:07PM -0700,

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-17 Thread Daniel Mack
On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi Sven, On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:40:07PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-15 Thread Daniel Mack
On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> Hi Sven, >> >> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:40:07PM -0700,

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-15 Thread Daniel Mack
On 13.07.2012 09:01, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi Sven, On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:40:07PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-13 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > >On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:40:07PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > >>This seems to have

Re: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN

2012-07-13 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:36:51PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi Sven, On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:38:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:40:07PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: This seems to have been broken since