On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Nick Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
> > Yes, I would like to expand them. If possibly, I'd like to take out
> > the individual config options for gcc flags and integrate them into
> > the
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
> Yes, I would like to expand them. If possibly, I'd like to take out
> the individual config options for gcc flags and integrate them into
> the help description. I feel that the redundancy would not only be
> ugly, but possibly
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Nick Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 05:28:23PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
> > First of all, thanks for the input!
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Nick Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 05:28:23PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
First of all, thanks for the input!
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0500,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
Yes, I would like to expand them. If possibly, I'd like to take out
the individual config options for gcc flags and integrate them into
the help description. I feel that the redundancy would not only be
ugly, but possibly
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Nick Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
Yes, I would like to expand them. If possibly, I'd like to take out
the individual config options for gcc flags and integrate them into
the help
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 05:28:23PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
> First of all, thanks for the input!
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
>
> There are a few places in the Makefile
First of all, thanks for the input!
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
> > Does anyone else have any input on this? Tips, suggestions, ideas,
> > comments, constructive criticism, anything
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
> Does anyone else have any input on this? Tips, suggestions, ideas,
> comments, constructive criticism, anything at all. I am, however,
> trying to avoid a flame war.
I missed it the first time you posted it, so thanks for
Does anyone else have any input on this? Tips, suggestions, ideas,
comments, constructive criticism, anything at all. I am, however,
trying to avoid a flame war.
~Nicholas (Alex) Marquez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Nicholas Marquez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
Does anyone else have any input on this? Tips, suggestions, ideas,
comments, constructive criticism, anything at all. I am, however,
trying to avoid a flame war.
~Nicholas (Alex) Marquez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Nicholas Marquez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I submitted
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
Does anyone else have any input on this? Tips, suggestions, ideas,
comments, constructive criticism, anything at all. I am, however,
trying to avoid a flame war.
I missed it the first time you posted it, so thanks for
First of all, thanks for the input!
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
Does anyone else have any input on this? Tips, suggestions, ideas,
comments, constructive criticism, anything at all.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 05:28:23PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
First of all, thanks for the input!
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Nick Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:28:50PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
There are a few places in the Makefile where options
On Feb 17, 2008 5:37 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:52:51PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
> > I submitted this patch to the zen-sources Gentoo community and got
> > much praise and has promptly been included. This kind of thing have
> > very likely
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:52:51PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
> I submitted this patch to the zen-sources Gentoo community and got
> much praise and has promptly been included. This kind of thing have
> very likely already been done in other patchsets, but I haven't seen
> it around,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:52:51PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
I submitted this patch to the zen-sources Gentoo community and got
much praise and has promptly been included. This kind of thing have
very likely already been done in other patchsets, but I haven't seen
it around,
Probably it
On Feb 17, 2008 5:37 AM, Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:52:51PM -0500, Nicholas Marquez wrote:
I submitted this patch to the zen-sources Gentoo community and got
much praise and has promptly been included. This kind of thing have
very likely already
I submitted this patch to the zen-sources Gentoo community and got
much praise and has promptly been included. This kind of thing have
very likely already been done in other patchsets, but I haven't seen
it around, so I've gone ahead and made one. The idea is that one can
enable -Os and various
I submitted this patch to the zen-sources Gentoo community and got
much praise and has promptly been included. This kind of thing have
very likely already been done in other patchsets, but I haven't seen
it around, so I've gone ahead and made one. The idea is that one can
enable -Os and various
20 matches
Mail list logo
