Re: [PATCH] Re: MatroxFB support can't be compiled into kernel

2001-01-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > On 26 Jan 01 at 14:29, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > > > Subject says it all - works as a module, but can't be compiled into the > > kernel because of duplicate definitions, caused by several files including > > matroxfb_base.h which in turn defines global_disp. > >

[PATCH] Re: MatroxFB support can't be compiled into kernel

2001-01-26 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 26 Jan 01 at 14:29, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > Subject says it all - works as a module, but can't be compiled into the > kernel because of duplicate definitions, caused by several files including > matroxfb_base.h which in turn defines global_disp. > > Patch attached. Oops. I did not

[PATCH] Re: MatroxFB support can't be compiled into kernel

2001-01-26 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 26 Jan 01 at 14:29, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Subject says it all - works as a module, but can't be compiled into the kernel because of duplicate definitions, caused by several files including matroxfb_base.h which in turn defines global_disp. Patch attached. Oops. I did not tried

Re: [PATCH] Re: MatroxFB support can't be compiled into kernel

2001-01-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Petr Vandrovec wrote: On 26 Jan 01 at 14:29, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Subject says it all - works as a module, but can't be compiled into the kernel because of duplicate definitions, caused by several files including matroxfb_base.h which in turn defines global_disp. Patch