Re: [PATCH] Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0

Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Micah Gorrell wrote: > > Because of the problems we where having we are no longer using the machine > > with 3 nics. We are now using a machine with just one and it is going live > > next week. We do need kernel 2.4 because of the process limits in 2.2. > > Does the

[PATCH] Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0

Micah Gorrell wrote: > Because of the problems we where having we are no longer using the machine > with 3 nics. We are now using a machine with just one and it is going live > next week. We do need kernel 2.4 because of the process limits in 2.2. > Does the 'Enable Power Management

[PATCH] Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0

Micah Gorrell wrote: Because of the problems we where having we are no longer using the machine with 3 nics. We are now using a machine with just one and it is going live next week. We do need kernel 2.4 because of the process limits in 2.2. Does the 'Enable Power Management (EXPERIMENTAL)'

Re: [PATCH] Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0

Jeff Garzik wrote: Micah Gorrell wrote: Because of the problems we where having we are no longer using the machine with 3 nics. We are now using a machine with just one and it is going live next week. We do need kernel 2.4 because of the process limits in 2.2. Does the 'Enable Power