Hi!
> >You can do without ret variable... Also more detailed changelog would
> >be nice... like what exact problem this works around.
> >
>
> Sure i can, but I don't see a reason to ignore SM's return value. Changelog
> of what?
>
> I guess if you read the thread over the ML you'll have
Hi!
You can do without ret variable... Also more detailed changelog would
be nice... like what exact problem this works around.
Sure i can, but I don't see a reason to ignore SM's return value. Changelog
of what?
I guess if you read the thread over the ML you'll have your questions
Hi,
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Pavel Machek
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Pali Rohár
>Изпратено на: Събота, 2013, Март 30 20:36:54 EET
>
>
>Hi!
>
>> +u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u
Hi!
> +u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
> +u32 arg3, u32 arg4)
> +{
> + u32 ret;
> + u32 param[5];
> +
> + param[0] = nargs+1;
> + param[1] = arg1;
> + param[2] = arg2;
> + param[3] = arg3;
> +
Hi!
+u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
+u32 arg3, u32 arg4)
+{
+ u32 ret;
+ u32 param[5];
+
+ param[0] = nargs+1;
+ param[1] = arg1;
+ param[2] = arg2;
+ param[3] = arg3;
+ param[4] = arg4;
Hi,
Оригинално писмо
От: Pavel Machek
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Pali Rohár
Изпратено на: Събота, 2013, Март 30 20:36:54 EET
Hi!
+u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32
arg2
* Ивайло Димитров [130327 22:34]:
> Tony,
>
> Who do you expect to make that code merge? Do you expect us to mechanically
> merge RX51 PPA API patch with the existing generic OMAP PPA API code putting
> #ifdefs all over the place? Not that it is impossible, but the only real
> piece of HW I
* Santosh Shilimkar [130328 03:10]:
> On Thursday 28 March 2013 03:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> >>> it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
> >>
> >> I think we
On Thursday 28 March 2013 03:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
>>> it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
>>
>> I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
>
> I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for ARM.
>
> AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for ARM.
AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is
On Thursday 28 March 2013 03:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130328 03:10]:
On Thursday 28 March 2013 03:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:56:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973
* Ивайло Димитров freemangor...@abv.bg [130327 22:34]:
Tony,
Who do you expect to make that code merge? Do you expect us to mechanically
merge RX51 PPA API patch with the existing generic OMAP PPA API code putting
#ifdefs all over the place? Not that it is impossible, but the only real
the code will still work on
the other platforms besides RX51, once the code modified. Please, advice on how
to proceed.
Regards,
Ivo
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Tony Lindgren
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Pali Rohár
&
* Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for ARM.
AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
implementations. So the handler and passing of the parameters
seems like
* Pali Rohár [130327 14:09]:
> On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> > > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
> > > RX-51?
> >
> > I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
> > ARM.
> >
> > AFAIK just
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár [130324 07:31]:
> > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
> > RX-51?
>
> I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
> ARM.
>
> AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
ARM.
AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130327 14:09]:
On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130324 07:31]:
it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for RX-51?
I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for ARM.
AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
implementations. So the handler and passing of the
the code will still work on
the other platforms besides RX51, once the code modified. Please, advice on how
to proceed.
Regards,
Ivo
Оригинално писмо
От: Tony Lindgren
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Pali Rohár
Изпратено на: Сряда
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 20:13:15 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 March 2013 18:51:21 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Rohár [130306 06:13]:
> > > On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > * Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 20:13:15 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 18:51:21 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130306 06:13]:
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 18:51:21 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár [130306 06:13]:
> > On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > They look similar, but they
* Pali Rohár [130306 06:13]:
> On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
> wrote:
> > > > They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The
> > > > first major difference is here (code
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
wrote:
> > > They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The
> > > first major difference is here (code taken from
> > > omap-smc.S)
> > >
> > >>
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Aaro Koskinen
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Ивайло Димитров
>Изпратено на: Събота, 2013, Март 2 01:51:39 EET
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров
Оригинално писмо
От: Aaro Koskinen
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Ивайло Димитров
Изпратено на: Събота, 2013, Март 2 01:51:39 EET
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
Unfortunately
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The
first major difference is here (code taken from
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130306 06:13]:
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 18:51:21 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com [130306 06:13]:
On Monday 04 March 2013 19:58:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров
freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
* Nishanth Menon [130301 06:42]:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
> >
> > They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The first major
> > difference is here (code taken from omap-smc.S)
> >
> >> ENTRY(omap_smc2)
> >> stmfd sp!, {r4-r12, lr}
> >>
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [130301 06:42]:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The first major
difference is here (code taken from omap-smc.S)
ENTRY(omap_smc2)
stmfd sp!, {r4-r12,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
> Unfortunately it is necessary, on RX-51 PPA/NOLO leaves IBE bit unset.
You sure? I think you need to explain this more - the commit message in
the original patch is empty/missing...
A.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
>
> They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The first major difference
> is here (code taken from omap-smc.S)
>
>> ENTRY(omap_smc2)
>> stmfd sp!, {r4-r12, lr}
>> mov r3, r2
>> mov r2, r1
>>
Unfortunately it is necessary, on RX-51 PPA/NOLO leaves IBE bit unset.
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Peter De Schrijver
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Pali Rohár
>Изпратено на: Петък, 2013, Март 1 11:43:14 EET
>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66
> +++
>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66
Unfortunately it is necessary, on RX-51 PPA/NOLO leaves IBE bit unset.
Оригинално писмо
От: Peter De Schrijver
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Pali Rohár
Изпратено на: Петък, 2013, Март 1 11:43:14 EET
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ивайло Димитров freemangor...@abv.bg wrote:
They look similar, but they are not equivalent :). The first major difference
is here (code taken from omap-smc.S)
ENTRY(omap_smc2)
stmfd sp!, {r4-r12, lr}
mov r3, r2
mov r2,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:09:12PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
Unfortunately it is necessary, on RX-51 PPA/NOLO leaves IBE bit unset.
You sure? I think you need to explain this more - the commit message in
the original patch is empty/missing...
A.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
nder does
it worth. Not to say that I don't have BB around to test if the code still
works if I make changes to omap2-secure.c/omap-smc.S :)
> Оригинално писмо --------
>От: Nishanth Menon
>Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
>До: Pali Roh
On 10:42-20130228, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66
> +++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.h | 36
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66 +++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.h | 36 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-smc.S
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66 +++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.h | 36 +
On 10:42-20130228, Pali Rohár wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile|1 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-secure.c | 66
+++
to test if the code still
works if I make changes to omap2-secure.c/omap-smc.S :)
Оригинално писмо
От: Nishanth Menon
Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
До: Pali Rohár
Изпратено на: Четвъртък, 2013, Февруари 28 16:40:05 EET
On 10:42
48 matches
Mail list logo
