From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:33:16 -0700
> Only x86_64 and ia64 are fixed. Would it be correct to assume that the
> other CONFIG_COMPAT architectures also need to be fixed?
Only platforms which compat to "i386" have the issue wrt.
the alignment of "u64"
Andrew Morton writes:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:21:47 +0400
> Vasily Tarasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Vasily Tarasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This patch should be applied after Arnd Bergmann's patch,
> > that intoduces new compat types:
> >
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:21:47 +0400
Vasily Tarasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Vasily Tarasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch should be applied after Arnd Bergmann's patch,
> that intoduces new compat types:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/15/98
>
> OpenVZ Linux kernel team has
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:21:47 +0400
Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch should be applied after Arnd Bergmann's patch,
that intoduces new compat types:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/15/98
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the
Andrew Morton writes:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:21:47 +0400
Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch should be applied after Arnd Bergmann's patch,
that intoduces new compat types:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/15/98
OpenVZ
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:33:16 -0700
Only x86_64 and ia64 are fixed. Would it be correct to assume that the
other CONFIG_COMPAT architectures also need to be fixed?
Only platforms which compat to i386 have the issue wrt.
the alignment of u64 types, which
From: Vasily Tarasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch should be applied after Arnd Bergmann's patch,
that intoduces new compat types:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/15/98
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 17:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> > I just noticed that we can not avoid the addition of packed attribute.
> > Look, for example:
> >
> > struct if_dqblk {
> > __u64 dqb_bhardlimit;
> > __u64 dqb_bsoftlimit;
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 17:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
I just noticed that we can not avoid the addition of packed attribute.
Look, for example:
struct if_dqblk {
__u64 dqb_bhardlimit;
__u64 dqb_bsoftlimit;
From: Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch should be applied after Arnd Bergmann's patch,
that intoduces new compat types:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/15/98
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel
On Friday 15 June 2007, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> I just noticed that we can not avoid the addition of packed attribute.
> Look, for example:
>
> struct if_dqblk {
> __u64 dqb_bhardlimit;
> __u64 dqb_bsoftlimit;
> __u64 dqb_curspace;
> __u64 dqb_ihardlimit;
>
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:43 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14
> > > 15:55:26.0 +0400
> > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
> > ...
> > >
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:43:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig=A0=A0=A0=A02007-06-14 15:55:=
> 26.0 +0400
> > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c=A02007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +=
> 0400
> >
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:43 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14
> > > 15:55:26.0 +0400
> > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
> > ...
> > >
On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14 15:55:26.0
> > +0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
> ...
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_IA64)
> > +/*
> > + *
You can find a half-year back discussions of this patch:
First attempt: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/19/123
Second attempt: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/25/57
I think they will answer your questions.
Thank you,
Vasily
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:03 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Fri, 15
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:01:48 +0400, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
> with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
> In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
> the comment "sys_quotactl seems to be
From: Vasily Tarasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
the comment "sys_quotactl seems to be 32/64bit clean, enable it for
From: Vasily Tarasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
the comment "sys_quotactl seems to be 32/64bit clean, enable it for
From: Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
the comment sys_quotactl seems to be 32/64bit clean, enable it for
From: Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
the comment sys_quotactl seems to be 32/64bit clean, enable it for
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:01:48 +0400, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
the comment sys_quotactl seems to be 32/64bit
You can find a half-year back discussions of this patch:
First attempt: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/19/123
Second attempt: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/25/57
I think they will answer your questions.
Thank you,
Vasily
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:03 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun
On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14 15:55:26.0
+0400
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
...
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_IA64)
+/*
+ * This code works
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:43 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14
15:55:26.0 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
...
+#if
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:43:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig=A0=A0=A0=A02007-06-14 15:55:=
26.0 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c=A02007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +=
0400
...
+#if
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:43 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14
15:55:26.0 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
...
+#if
On Friday 15 June 2007, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
I just noticed that we can not avoid the addition of packed attribute.
Look, for example:
struct if_dqblk {
__u64 dqb_bhardlimit;
__u64 dqb_bsoftlimit;
__u64 dqb_curspace;
__u64 dqb_ihardlimit;
__u64
28 matches
Mail list logo
