Em Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:19:45AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:34:37PM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > The iregs output was missing the newline at end as well as the leading
> > ABI output. This made it hard to compare the iregs and uregs values.
> > Instead, use a
Em Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:19:45AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:34:37PM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > The iregs output was missing the newline at end as well as the leading
> > ABI output. This made it hard to compare the iregs and uregs values.
> > Instead, use a
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:34:37PM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> The iregs output was missing the newline at end as well as the leading
> ABI output. This made it hard to compare the iregs and uregs values.
> Instead, use a single function to output the register values and use
> it for both, iregs
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:34:37PM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> The iregs output was missing the newline at end as well as the leading
> ABI output. This made it hard to compare the iregs and uregs values.
> Instead, use a single function to output the register values and use
> it for both, iregs
The iregs output was missing the newline at end as well as the leading
ABI output. This made it hard to compare the iregs and uregs values.
Instead, use a single function to output the register values and use
it for both, iregs and uregs, to ensure the output is consistent.
Before:
```
perf
The iregs output was missing the newline at end as well as the leading
ABI output. This made it hard to compare the iregs and uregs values.
Instead, use a single function to output the register values and use
it for both, iregs and uregs, to ensure the output is consistent.
Before:
```
perf
6 matches
Mail list logo