* Alexander van Heukelum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Either way, the code should be shared between 32 and 64 bits. There
> > is nothing bitsize-specific about it!
>
> Of course. That's also why I already added the old-Dell case ;). But
> one problem at a time, please!
i've applied your
* Alexander van Heukelum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either way, the code should be shared between 32 and 64 bits. There
is nothing bitsize-specific about it!
Of course. That's also why I already added the old-Dell case ;). But
one problem at a time, please!
i've applied your patch to
Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
Hello hpa,
I failed to find a comment referring to 0x413 or int 0x12 in
arch/x86/kernel. I do know the comment in Documentation/i386/boot.txt,
however, suggesting that "INT 12h" _should_ be used, but that it would
be pointless for zImage and old bzImage kernels,
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:13:17 -0800, "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 45
> > +++--
> > 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 45 +++--
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
index 38f32e7..b684552 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
+++
Explicitly reserve_early the whole address range from the end of
conventional memory as reported by the bios data area up to the
1Mb mark. Regard the info retrieved from the BIOS data area with
a bit of paranoia, though, because some biosses forget to register
the EBDA correctly.
Signed-off-by:
Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 45 +++--
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
index 38f32e7..b684552 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
+++
Explicitly reserve_early the whole address range from the end of
conventional memory as reported by the bios data area up to the
1Mb mark. Regard the info retrieved from the BIOS data area with
a bit of paranoia, though, because some biosses forget to register
the EBDA correctly.
Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:13:17 -0800, H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 45
+++--
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
Hello hpa,
I failed to find a comment referring to 0x413 or int 0x12 in
arch/x86/kernel. I do know the comment in Documentation/i386/boot.txt,
however, suggesting that INT 12h _should_ be used, but that it would
be pointless for zImage and old bzImage kernels,
10 matches
Mail list logo