On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Grant Grundler
>> wrote:
>>> Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
>>
>> It's on my
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Grant Grundler
>> wrote:
>>> Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
>>
>> It's on my list of patches to review, patience please.
>
> No problem! Thank you!
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
>> Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
>
> It's on my list of patches to review, patience please.
No problem! Thank you!
just wanted
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
>> Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
>
> It's on my list of patches to review, patience please.
No problem! Thank you!
just wanted confirmation it wasn't overlooked.
cheers,
grant
>
>>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
It's on my list of patches to review, patience please.
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>
>> 'perms' will never be NULL since it
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
It's on my list of patches to review, patience please.
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>
>> 'perms' will never be NULL since it isn't a plain pointer but an array
>> of u32
[resending as plain text only - sorry]
Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
LGTM.
cheers,
grant
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> 'perms' will never be NULL since it isn't a plain pointer but an array
> of u32 values.
>
> This fixes the following
[resending as plain text only - sorry]
Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
LGTM.
cheers,
grant
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> 'perms' will never be NULL since it isn't a plain pointer but an array
> of u32 values.
>
> This fixes the following warning when building
'perms' will never be NULL since it isn't a plain pointer but an array
of u32 values.
This fixes the following warning when building with clang:
security/selinux/ss/services.c:158:16: error: address of array
'p_in->perms' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
'perms' will never be NULL since it isn't a plain pointer but an array
of u32 values.
This fixes the following warning when building with clang:
security/selinux/ss/services.c:158:16: error: address of array
'p_in->perms' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
10 matches
Mail list logo