On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:24:56 -0700 David Daney wrote:
> > otherwise the bugs
> > stemming from incorrect use can be tricky to catch.
> >
>
> ... all my patch does is allow on_each_cpu_mask() to be called with IRQs
> disabled if we are in Early Boot. This is already the case with
>
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:24:56 -0700 David Daney dda...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
otherwise the bugs
stemming from incorrect use can be tricky to catch.
... all my patch does is allow on_each_cpu_mask() to be called with IRQs
disabled if we are in Early Boot. This is already the case
On 08/09/2013 11:51 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:27 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 08/08/2013 12:25 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, David Daney wrote:
I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
local_irq_enable(), but I want to use
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:27 PM, David Daney wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2013 12:25 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, David Daney wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
>>> local_irq_enable(), but I want to use this function in MIPS/OCTEON
>>>
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:27 PM, David Daney dda...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
On 08/08/2013 12:25 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, David Daney wrote:
I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
local_irq_enable(), but I want to use this function in
On 08/09/2013 11:51 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:27 PM, David Daney dda...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
On 08/08/2013 12:25 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, David Daney wrote:
I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
On 08/08/2013 12:25 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, David Daney wrote:
I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
local_irq_enable(), but I want to use this function in MIPS/OCTEON
early boot (when we have early_boot_irqs_disabled). This also makes
this
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, David Daney wrote:
> I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
> local_irq_enable(), but I want to use this function in MIPS/OCTEON
> early boot (when we have early_boot_irqs_disabled). This also makes
> this function have similar semantics to
From: David Daney
As in f21afc25f9ed (smp.h: Use local_irq_{save,restore}() in !SMP
version of on_each_cpu().), we don't want to enable irqs if they are
not already enabled.
I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
local_irq_enable(), but I want to use this function in
From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
As in f21afc25f9ed (smp.h: Use local_irq_{save,restore}() in !SMP
version of on_each_cpu().), we don't want to enable irqs if they are
not already enabled.
I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
local_irq_enable(), but I want to
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, David Daney wrote:
I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
local_irq_enable(), but I want to use this function in MIPS/OCTEON
early boot (when we have early_boot_irqs_disabled). This also makes
this function have similar semantics to on_each_cpu()
On 08/08/2013 12:25 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, David Daney wrote:
I don't know of any bugs currently caused by this unconditional
local_irq_enable(), but I want to use this function in MIPS/OCTEON
early boot (when we have early_boot_irqs_disabled). This also makes
this
12 matches
Mail list logo
