Re: [PATCH] x86/build: Use cc-option to validate stack alignment parameter

* Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > With 8f91869766c0 ("x86/build: Fix stack alignment for CLang") cc-option > is only used to determine the name of the stack alignment option supported > by the compiler, but not to verify that the actual parameter =N is > valid in combination with

Re: [PATCH] x86/build: Use cc-option to validate stack alignment parameter

* Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > With 8f91869766c0 ("x86/build: Fix stack alignment for CLang") cc-option > is only used to determine the name of the stack alignment option supported > by the compiler, but not to verify that the actual parameter =N is > valid in combination with the other CFLAGS.

[PATCH] x86/build: Use cc-option to validate stack alignment parameter

With 8f91869766c0 ("x86/build: Fix stack alignment for CLang") cc-option is only used to determine the name of the stack alignment option supported by the compiler, but not to verify that the actual parameter =N is valid in combination with the other CFLAGS. This causes problems with older gcc

[PATCH] x86/build: Use cc-option to validate stack alignment parameter

With 8f91869766c0 ("x86/build: Fix stack alignment for CLang") cc-option is only used to determine the name of the stack alignment option supported by the compiler, but not to verify that the actual parameter =N is valid in combination with the other CFLAGS. This causes problems with older gcc