In that case, Bryan may like to know that git, mercurial (IIRC),
and quilt have patchbomb tools. Also GregKH has one somewhere (he
can tell you where). And Paul Jacksone has one at
http://www.speakeasy.org/~pj99/sgi/sendpatchset
Thanks a lot, I will try on my side. And one more
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 08:34 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:45 +0800 Wu, Bryan wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 22:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:45 +0800 Wu, Bryan wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 22:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:40:45PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
>
> Thanks for this guide line information. I will dig into it.
>
> But in my experience, it is difficult to find right patch email
> receivers, even in the MAINTAINERS file. If there are 20 patch emails,
> we should find 20 email
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:40:45PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
Thanks for this guide line information. I will dig into it.
But in my experience, it is difficult to find right patch email
receivers, even in the MAINTAINERS file. If there are 20 patch emails,
we should find 20 email receivers at
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:45 +0800 Wu, Bryan wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 22:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 08:34 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:40:45 +0800 Wu, Bryan wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 22:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue,
In that case, Bryan may like to know that git, mercurial (IIRC),
and quilt have patchbomb tools. Also GregKH has one somewhere (he
can tell you where). And Paul Jacksone has one at
http://www.speakeasy.org/~pj99/sgi/sendpatchset
Thanks a lot, I will try on my side. And one more
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 22:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 01:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >You should really consider the latter for getting updates
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >You should really consider the latter for getting updates
On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the
> >future
>
> we're planning for this, but the short
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the
> >future
>
> we're planning for this, but the short term it isnt doable for us
>
If you think mangling
On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the future
we're planning for this, but the short term it isnt doable for us
now that most of the initial troubles are resolved.
i would say initial troubles are resolved
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:40:37AM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> Thanks Arnd. I posted almost ten patches yesterday. Converting ten
> patches to preformatted Emails is terrible manually, you know.
>
> How does a kernel guru to do this, send out dozens of patch emails a
> day? Is there any convenient
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 23:45 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I can see nothing wrong with your patches, but you should make the
> patch descriptions a little clearer:
>
Thanks Arnd. I posted almost ten patches yesterday. Converting ten
patches to preformatted Emails is terrible manually, you know.
I can see nothing wrong with your patches, but you should make the
patch descriptions a little clearer:
On Monday 26 March 2007, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> Hi folks,
No need for this line, if it's there, Andrew just needs to remove
it from the changelog.
> This patch adds kdebug.h header file to
Hi folks,
This patch adds kdebug.h header file to blackfin architecture.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-blackfin/kdebug.h |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-blackfin/kdebug.h
Hi folks,
This patch adds kdebug.h header file to blackfin architecture.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/asm-blackfin/kdebug.h |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-blackfin/kdebug.h
I can see nothing wrong with your patches, but you should make the
patch descriptions a little clearer:
On Monday 26 March 2007, Wu, Bryan wrote:
Hi folks,
No need for this line, if it's there, Andrew just needs to remove
it from the changelog.
This patch adds kdebug.h header file to blackfin
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 23:45 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I can see nothing wrong with your patches, but you should make the
patch descriptions a little clearer:
Thanks Arnd. I posted almost ten patches yesterday. Converting ten
patches to preformatted Emails is terrible manually, you know.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:40:37AM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
Thanks Arnd. I posted almost ten patches yesterday. Converting ten
patches to preformatted Emails is terrible manually, you know.
How does a kernel guru to do this, send out dozens of patch emails a
day? Is there any convenient tools
On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the future
we're planning for this, but the short term it isnt doable for us
now that most of the initial troubles are resolved.
i would say initial troubles are resolved
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the
future
we're planning for this, but the short term it isnt doable for us
If you think mangling patches by
On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the
future
we're planning for this, but the short term it isnt
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 01:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really consider the latter for getting updates merged in the
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 22:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:17:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/27/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 12:34:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 3/26/07, Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should
28 matches
Mail list logo
