Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Michal Januszewski
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:31:59PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > Anyway, I think it is up to Michal to decide if we should remove the > > kernel support for other archs, or let it stay a bit more while working > > on solving the v86d side of things. So I'll just step aside now > > > Once

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: > Paul Mundt wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: > >>[...] > >>Why do you say that it's x86 specific? Am I missing something? > >> > >The emulator it uses only runs on x86 and x86_64. Thus, it's x86

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paulo Marques
Paul Mundt wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: [...] Why do you say that it's x86 specific? Am I missing something? The emulator it uses only runs on x86 and x86_64. Thus, it's x86 specific. The v86d and uvesafb pages seem to be in disagremeent, unless by

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: > Paul Mundt wrote: > >uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig. > > Hummm... uvesafb _shouldn't_ be x86 specific. At least according to > their page [1] where it says: "works on non-x86 systems". > > Uvesafb uses a x86

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paulo Marques
Paul Mundt wrote: uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig. Hummm... uvesafb _shouldn't_ be x86 specific. At least according to their page [1] where it says: "works on non-x86 systems". Uvesafb uses a x86 emulator in userspace to run code from the video card ROM, so it should

[PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paul Mundt
uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- drivers/video/Kconfig |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/video/Kconfig 2007-09-11 15:15:52.0 +0900 +++

[PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paul Mundt
uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- drivers/video/Kconfig |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/video/Kconfig 2007-09-11 15:15:52.0 +0900 +++

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paulo Marques
Paul Mundt wrote: uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig. Hummm... uvesafb _shouldn't_ be x86 specific. At least according to their page [1] where it says: works on non-x86 systems. Uvesafb uses a x86 emulator in userspace to run code from the video card ROM, so it should

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: Paul Mundt wrote: uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig. Hummm... uvesafb _shouldn't_ be x86 specific. At least according to their page [1] where it says: works on non-x86 systems. Uvesafb uses a x86 emulator

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paulo Marques
Paul Mundt wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: [...] Why do you say that it's x86 specific? Am I missing something? The emulator it uses only runs on x86 and x86_64. Thus, it's x86 specific. The v86d and uvesafb pages seem to be in disagremeent, unless by

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: Paul Mundt wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote: [...] Why do you say that it's x86 specific? Am I missing something? The emulator it uses only runs on x86 and x86_64. Thus, it's x86 specific.

Re: [PATCH -mm] video: uvesafb: Add X86 dependency.

2007-09-11 Thread Michal Januszewski
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:31:59PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: Anyway, I think it is up to Michal to decide if we should remove the kernel support for other archs, or let it stay a bit more while working on solving the v86d side of things. So I'll just step aside now Once v86d is