On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:31:59PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > Anyway, I think it is up to Michal to decide if we should remove the
> > kernel support for other archs, or let it stay a bit more while working
> > on solving the v86d side of things. So I'll just step aside now
> >
> Once
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Paul Mundt wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
> >>[...]
> >>Why do you say that it's x86 specific? Am I missing something?
> >>
> >The emulator it uses only runs on x86 and x86_64. Thus, it's x86
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
Why do you say that it's x86 specific? Am I missing something?
The emulator it uses only runs on x86 and x86_64. Thus, it's x86
specific. The v86d and uvesafb pages seem to be in disagremeent, unless
by
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Paul Mundt wrote:
> >uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig.
>
> Hummm... uvesafb _shouldn't_ be x86 specific. At least according to
> their page [1] where it says: "works on non-x86 systems".
>
> Uvesafb uses a x86
Paul Mundt wrote:
uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig.
Hummm... uvesafb _shouldn't_ be x86 specific. At least according to
their page [1] where it says: "works on non-x86 systems".
Uvesafb uses a x86 emulator in userspace to run code from the video card
ROM, so it should
uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
drivers/video/Kconfig |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/video/Kconfig 2007-09-11
15:15:52.0 +0900
+++
uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
drivers/video/Kconfig |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/video/Kconfig 2007-09-11
15:15:52.0 +0900
+++
Paul Mundt wrote:
uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig.
Hummm... uvesafb _shouldn't_ be x86 specific. At least according to
their page [1] where it says: works on non-x86 systems.
Uvesafb uses a x86 emulator in userspace to run code from the video card
ROM, so it should
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
uvesafb is x86-specific, reflect that in the Kconfig.
Hummm... uvesafb _shouldn't_ be x86 specific. At least according to
their page [1] where it says: works on non-x86 systems.
Uvesafb uses a x86 emulator
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
Why do you say that it's x86 specific? Am I missing something?
The emulator it uses only runs on x86 and x86_64. Thus, it's x86
specific. The v86d and uvesafb pages seem to be in disagremeent, unless
by
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:41:49PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
[...]
Why do you say that it's x86 specific? Am I missing something?
The emulator it uses only runs on x86 and x86_64. Thus, it's x86
specific.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:31:59PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
Anyway, I think it is up to Michal to decide if we should remove the
kernel support for other archs, or let it stay a bit more while working
on solving the v86d side of things. So I'll just step aside now
Once v86d is
12 matches
Mail list logo