On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 08:15 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:52:22PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:52:22PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > I'm unclear on how urgent these fixes are. I
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:52:22PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I'm unclear on how urgent these
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 08:15 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:52:22PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > These two patches are supposed to
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> > wrote:
> >
> > > These two patches are supposed to "fix" failed order-4 memory
> > > allocations which have been
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200 Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
These two patches are supposed to fix failed order-4
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens
> wrote:
>
> > These two patches are supposed to "fix" failed order-4 memory
> > allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
> > The problem has been observed on
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
These two patches are supposed to fix failed order-4 memory
allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
The problem has
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> These two patches are supposed to "fix" failed order-4 memory
> allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
> The problem has been observed on s390 as well as on x86.
>
> To address the problem change the seq_file
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
These two patches are supposed to fix failed order-4 memory
allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
The problem has been observed on s390 as well as on x86.
To address the problem
These two patches are supposed to "fix" failed order-4 memory
allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
The problem has been observed on s390 as well as on x86.
To address the problem change the seq_file memory allocations to
fallback to use vmalloc, so that allocations also
These two patches are supposed to fix failed order-4 memory
allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
The problem has been observed on s390 as well as on x86.
To address the problem change the seq_file memory allocations to
fallback to use vmalloc, so that allocations also
14 matches
Mail list logo