On 04/12/2013 03:57 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:16:57PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 04/11/2013 03:25 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:16:57PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 04/11/2013 03:25 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >> Arnd, Olof,
> > >> do you have any thoughts on this series?
> >
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:16:57PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 04/11/2013 03:25 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> Arnd, Olof,
> >> do you have any thoughts on this series?
> >> Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:16:57PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
On 04/11/2013 03:25 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?
The
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:16:57PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
On 04/11/2013 03:25 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
Would you be
On 04/12/2013 03:57 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 09:16:57PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
On 04/11/2013 03:25 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
Would you be happy to
On 04/11/2013 03:25 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Arnd, Olof,
>> do you have any thoughts on this series?
>> Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?
>>
>> The last patch, "xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Arnd, Olof,
> do you have any thoughts on this series?
> Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?
>
> The last patch, "xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen" has
> a (small) dependency on this series:
>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?
The last patch, xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen has
a (small) dependency on this series:
On 04/11/2013 03:25 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?
The last patch, xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen has
a
Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?
The last patch, "xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen" has
a (small) dependency on this series:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=136430893610688=2
would you be OK with taking
Arnd, Olof,
do you have any thoughts on this series?
Would you be happy to carry it in the arm-soc tree?
The last patch, xen/arm: introduce xen_early_init, use PSCI on xen has
a (small) dependency on this series:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=136430893610688w=2
would you be OK with taking
Russell,
sorry for not CC'ing you explicitly since v1 of this series, there have
been quite few lengthy discussions on this topic.
Do you have any opinions on this?
Do you feel that this work belong to your tree, or do you want me to go
via arm-soc?
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Stefano Stabellini
Hi all,
this is the sixth version of the patch series to move virt_smp_ops out of
mach-virt and make it a generic set of reusable PSCI based smp_ops.
psci_smp_ops are preferred over the platform smp_ops.
I added a patch to introduce smp_init to this series.
In the last patch I am using smp_init to
Hi all,
this is the sixth version of the patch series to move virt_smp_ops out of
mach-virt and make it a generic set of reusable PSCI based smp_ops.
psci_smp_ops are preferred over the platform smp_ops.
I added a patch to introduce smp_init to this series.
In the last patch I am using smp_init to
Russell,
sorry for not CC'ing you explicitly since v1 of this series, there have
been quite few lengthy discussions on this topic.
Do you have any opinions on this?
Do you feel that this work belong to your tree, or do you want me to go
via arm-soc?
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Stefano Stabellini
16 matches
Mail list logo
