Re: [PATCH 10/19] USB: gadget/legacy: remove sb_mutex

2023-09-14 Thread Sergey Shtylyov
On 9/13/23 2:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Creating new a new super_block vs freeing the old one for single instance ^ I can't parse that. :-) > file systems is serialized by the wait for SB_DEAD. > > Remove the superfluous sb_mutex. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph

Re: [PATCH 10/19] USB: gadget/legacy: remove sb_mutex

2023-09-13 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 08:10:04AM -0300, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Creating new a new super_block vs freeing the old one for single instance > file systems is serialized by the wait for SB_DEAD. > > Remove the superfluous sb_mutex. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- You might mention

[PATCH 10/19] USB: gadget/legacy: remove sb_mutex

2023-09-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Creating new a new super_block vs freeing the old one for single instance file systems is serialized by the wait for SB_DEAD. Remove the superfluous sb_mutex. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig --- drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/inode.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git