On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 08:44 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > Here's a list of files that were moved from either i386 or x86_64 over
> > to the arch/x86 directory.
>
> Well, this means that your patch series doesn't actually *compile* as a
>
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Here's a list of files that were moved from either i386 or x86_64 over
> to the arch/x86 directory.
Well, this means that your patch series doesn't actually *compile* as a
series.
In other words, it's a pointless series, since the individual
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Here's a list of files that were moved from either i386 or x86_64 over
to the arch/x86 directory.
Well, this means that your patch series doesn't actually *compile* as a
series.
In other words, it's a pointless series, since the individual patches
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 08:44 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Here's a list of files that were moved from either i386 or x86_64 over
to the arch/x86 directory.
Well, this means that your patch series doesn't actually *compile* as a
series.
Here's a list of files that were moved from either i386 or x86_64 over
to the arch/x86 directory. Since I now used the git-diff -M option
(thanks Linus!), and to spare LKML with a lot of patches, I put all
the renames that were unmodified (strictly renamed) into this file,
with one exception. I
Here's a list of files that were moved from either i386 or x86_64 over
to the arch/x86 directory. Since I now used the git-diff -M option
(thanks Linus!), and to spare LKML with a lot of patches, I put all
the renames that were unmodified (strictly renamed) into this file,
with one exception. I
6 matches
Mail list logo
