On 02/11/2013 10:16 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:07:45AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 21:41 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:07:45AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 21:41 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
> > > in a single,
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 21:41 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
> > in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
> > code but is also
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 21:41 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
code but is also makes it
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:07:45AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 21:41 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
in a single, reader-friendly,
On 02/11/2013 10:16 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:07:45AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 21:41 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
> in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
> code but is also makes it easier to visualize. The new file looks like:
>
> Number of
Sorry, I forgot to include the updated ABI changes with this patch. Sending v2.
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 20:29 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
> in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
> code but is
Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
code but is also makes it easier to visualize. The new file looks like:
Number of reads:24
Number of writes: 1055
Invalid IO: 0
Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
code but is also makes it easier to visualize. The new file looks like:
Number of reads:24
Number of writes: 1055
Invalid IO: 0
Sorry, I forgot to include the updated ABI changes with this patch. Sending v2.
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 20:29 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
code but is also
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Instead of having one sysfs file per zram statistic, group them all
in a single, reader-friendly, 'statistics' file. This not only reduces
code but is also makes it easier to visualize. The new file looks like:
Number of reads:
12 matches
Mail list logo