On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> >> Probably some driver is needing a clk_get() or a clk_get_sys() is
>> >> needs to be added
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> >> Probably some driver is needing a clk_get() or a clk_get_sys() is
> >> needs to be added somewhere to bring up some vital cluster,
> >> or there may
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
Probably some driver is needing a clk_get() or a clk_get_sys() is
needs to be added somewhere to bring up some vital cluster,
or
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
Probably some driver is needing a clk_get() or a clk_get_sys()
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Probably some driver is needing a clk_get() or a clk_get_sys() is
>> needs to be added somewhere to bring up some vital cluster,
>> or there may be some out-of-tree driver needed to bring up the
>>
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> >> The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
> >> invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare()
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
>> invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
>> than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable()
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
> > invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
> > than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls. This
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
> invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
> than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls. This patch
> converts the Nomadik Pin Control driver to
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Depending on clock type, a clk_disable is actually not going to "gate"
> the clock, that might happen only in unprepare. This depends on if the
> clock is a fast or slow clock.
Hm thats interesting. Now I need to drill down into this.
So
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> Yeah drop it for now.
>
> Actually, a quick question before I do:
>
> If it's better/faster to prepare the clock and keep it prepared
> while you do clk_enable/clk_disable,
It is generally faster
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 25 October 2012 10:23, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> >
> >> >This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf
> >> >is still working on that one.
>
On 25 October 2012 10:23, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >
>> >This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf
>> >is still working on that one.
>> >
>> >So do you want me to remove this patch?
>> >
>>
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> >This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf
> >is still working on that one.
> >
> >So do you want me to remove this patch?
> >
>
> Yeah drop it for now.
Actually, a quick question
On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf
is still working on that one.
So do you want me to remove this patch?
Yeah drop it for now.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
> > invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
> > than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls. This
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable()
On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf
is still working on that one.
So do you want me to remove this patch?
Yeah drop it for now.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf
is still working on that one.
So do you want me to remove this patch?
Yeah drop it for now.
Actually, a quick question before I do:
If
On 25 October 2012 10:23, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf
is still working on that one.
So do you want me to remove this patch?
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 25 October 2012 10:23, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
On 10/25/2012 09:31 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
This certainly doesn't fix the bug we spoke about. I believe Ulf
is still working on that one.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
Yeah drop it for now.
Actually, a quick question before I do:
If it's better/faster to prepare the clock and keep it prepared
while you do clk_enable/clk_disable,
It is
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ulf Hansson ulf.hans...@linaro.org wrote:
Depending on clock type, a clk_disable is actually not going to gate
the clock, that might happen only in unprepare. This depends on if the
clock is a fast or slow clock.
Hm thats interesting. Now I need to drill down
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls. This patch
converts the Nomadik Pin
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable()
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
than the
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
invoke clock_prepare_enable()
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
Probably some driver is needing a clk_get() or a clk_get_sys() is
needs to be added somewhere to bring up some vital cluster,
or there may be some out-of-tree driver needed to
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
> invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
> than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls. This patch
> converts the Nomadik Pin Control driver to
The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls. This patch
converts the Nomadik Pin Control driver to the new framework.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls. This patch
converts the Nomadik Pin Control driver to the new framework.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
The clock framework has changed somewhat and it's now better to
invoke clock_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() rather
than the legacy clk_enable() and clk_disable() calls. This patch
converts the Nomadik Pin
32 matches
Mail list logo
