On 04/21/2017 05:00 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Maintenance is not development. It’s about doing all the followup
> _after_ the feature is declared to be developed. That’s been missing
> for quite some time in the case of the OSD pNFS code, which is why
> I’m not even bothering to consider
On 04/21/2017 05:00 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Maintenance is not development. It’s about doing all the followup
> _after_ the feature is declared to be developed. That’s been missing
> for quite some time in the case of the OSD pNFS code, which is why
> I’m not even bothering to consider
On 04/20/2017 11:18 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
<>
>
> OK. I'm applying this patch for the 4.12 merge window.
That is understandable this code was not tested for a long while
> If, as Boaz
> suggests, there is still an interest in exofs, then I suggest we put
> that to the test by moving it
On 04/20/2017 11:18 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
<>
>
> OK. I'm applying this patch for the 4.12 merge window.
That is understandable this code was not tested for a long while
> If, as Boaz
> suggests, there is still an interest in exofs, then I suggest we put
> that to the test by moving it
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 08:18:28PM +, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> OK. I'm applying this patch for the 4.12 merge window. If, as Boaz
> suggests, there is still an interest in exofs, then I suggest we put
> that to the test by moving it into the STAGING area, to see if someone
> will step up to
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 08:18:28PM +, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> OK. I'm applying this patch for the 4.12 merge window. If, as Boaz
> suggests, there is still an interest in exofs, then I suggest we put
> that to the test by moving it into the STAGING area, to see if someone
> will step up to
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:27:11AM +0200, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> I just came across this patch in linux-next commit 6d22323b2e9f.
> scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py reports that there is a leftover
> reference on PNFS_OBJLAYOUT in fs/exofs/Kconfig.ore line 10 (depends
> on
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:27:11AM +0200, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> I just came across this patch in linux-next commit 6d22323b2e9f.
> scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py reports that there is a leftover
> reference on PNFS_OBJLAYOUT in fs/exofs/Kconfig.ore line 10 (depends
> on
Hi Christoph,
I just came across this patch in linux-next commit 6d22323b2e9f.
scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py reports that there is a leftover
reference on PNFS_OBJLAYOUT in fs/exofs/Kconfig.ore line 10 (depends
on EXOFS_FS || PNFS_OBJLAYOUT). I assume that this reference can
safely be removed
Hi Christoph,
I just came across this patch in linux-next commit 6d22323b2e9f.
scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py reports that there is a leftover
reference on PNFS_OBJLAYOUT in fs/exofs/Kconfig.ore line 10 (depends
on EXOFS_FS || PNFS_OBJLAYOUT). I assume that this reference can
safely be removed
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 18:01 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The objlayout code has been in the tree, but it's been unmaintained
> and
> no server product for it actually ever shipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 18:01 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The objlayout code has been in the tree, but it's been unmaintained
> and
> no server product for it actually ever shipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 -
>
The objlayout code has been in the tree, but it's been unmaintained and
no server product for it actually ever shipped.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 -
Documentation/filesystems/nfs/pnfs.txt | 37 --
The objlayout code has been in the tree, but it's been unmaintained and
no server product for it actually ever shipped.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 -
Documentation/filesystems/nfs/pnfs.txt | 37 --
fs/nfs/Kconfig
14 matches
Mail list logo