From: Lee Jones
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:44 +
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1926971/
I'm fine with this:
Acked-by: David S. Miller
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
> >> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> >> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> >> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
> >> > be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
> >> > is
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
>> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
>> >
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
is required for the chip
From: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:44 +
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1926971/
I'm fine with this:
Acked-by: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On 9 January 2013 09:55, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
>> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
>> > framework
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
framework to do just that. If no clock is
On 9 January 2013 09:55, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> > SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> > framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
framework to do just that. If no clock is
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
> SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
> framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
> be ignored and the driver will continue to
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
is required for the chip to run
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
be ignored and the driver will continue to assume that no clock
is required for the chip to run
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
Some platforms provide clocks which require enabling before the
SMSC911x chip will power on. This patch uses the new common clk
framework to do just that. If no clock is provided, it will just
be ignored and the driver
16 matches
Mail list logo
