On Tuesday 25 September 2012, sebastien requiem wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> > > Regarding mv78xx0, I agree that I'm not sure what to do. The number
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Regarding mv78xx0, I agree that I'm not sure what to do. The number of
> > > supported platforms is small. Should we simply mark mv78xx0 deprecated
> > > now, wait a few release cycles to
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
> >
> > The next step would be to label mach-orion5x as deprecated in Kconfig for
> > a release and change the help text so it tells people to move to mach-mvebu
> > and submit dts files.
> >
>
> You seem to imply that
Arnd Bergmann writes:
Hi,
> On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> >
>> > > I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x &
>> > >
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >
> > > I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x &
> > > mach-mv78xx0. orion5x has probably
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Andrew Lunn,
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x &
> > mach-mv78xx0. orion5x has probably been broken since -rc1 was released
>
Dear Andrew Lunn,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x &
> mach-mv78xx0. orion5x has probably been broken since -rc1 was released
> and nobody noticed. In the same time, we got around 5 people
> independently
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:18:26AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:11:42 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>
> > I didn't try to post all the dove on mach-mvebu patches in the current
> > release cycle, because mach-mvebu is still
Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:11:42 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> I didn't try to post all the dove on mach-mvebu patches in the current
> release cycle, because mach-mvebu is still evolving to fast for me to keep
> up with my limited spare time. But I have dove
On 09/25/2012 07:35 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:02:17AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
The watchdog on dove requires an interrupt that is not yet
available on DT. Therefore, the watchdog DT node is removed
until the corresponding chained intc is available.
Just for
On 09/25/2012 07:35 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:02:17AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
The watchdog on dove requires an interrupt that is not yet
available on DT. Therefore, the watchdog DT node is removed
until the corresponding chained intc is available.
Just for
Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:11:42 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
I didn't try to post all the dove on mach-mvebu patches in the current
release cycle, because mach-mvebu is still evolving to fast for me to keep
up with my limited spare time. But I have dove running
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:18:26AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:11:42 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
I didn't try to post all the dove on mach-mvebu patches in the current
release cycle, because mach-mvebu is still evolving to
Dear Andrew Lunn,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x
mach-mv78xx0. orion5x has probably been broken since -rc1 was released
and nobody noticed. In the same time, we got around 5 people
independently
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Andrew Lunn,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x
mach-mv78xx0. orion5x has probably been broken since -rc1 was released
and
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x
mach-mv78xx0. orion5x has probably been broken
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de writes:
Hi,
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:14:39PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:46:10 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
I principle, i agree. However, i'm not too sure about mach-orion5x
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Arnaud Patard wrote:
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de writes:
The next step would be to label mach-orion5x as deprecated in Kconfig for
a release and change the help text so it tells people to move to mach-mvebu
and submit dts files.
You seem to imply that
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Regarding mv78xx0, I agree that I'm not sure what to do. The number of
supported platforms is small. Should we simply mark mv78xx0 deprecated
now, wait a few release cycles to see if
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, sebastien requiem wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Regarding mv78xx0, I agree that I'm not sure what to do. The
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:02:17AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> The watchdog on dove requires an interrupt that is not yet
> available on DT. Therefore, the watchdog DT node is removed
> until the corresponding chained intc is available.
Hi Sebastian
Just for my understanding: Is the
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:02:17AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
The watchdog on dove requires an interrupt that is not yet
available on DT. Therefore, the watchdog DT node is removed
until the corresponding chained intc is available.
Hi Sebastian
Just for my understanding: Is the
22 matches
Mail list logo
