Re: [PATCH 6/6] compat-drivers: do not use struct spinlock

2012-11-29 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > IMHO your patch should go upstream and a respective patch should be > submitted as well as for these drivers: > > mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-next (git::master)$ git grep "struct

Re: [PATCH 6/6] compat-drivers: do not use struct spinlock

2012-11-29 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > struct spinlock does not exists on kernel version <= 2.6.32, use > spinlock_t instead. > > Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens > --- > patches/network/67-use_spinlock_t.patch | 11 +++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > create mode

Re: [PATCH 6/6] compat-drivers: do not use struct spinlock

2012-11-29 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens ha...@hauke-m.de wrote: struct spinlock does not exists on kernel version = 2.6.32, use spinlock_t instead. Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens ha...@hauke-m.de --- patches/network/67-use_spinlock_t.patch | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11

Re: [PATCH 6/6] compat-drivers: do not use struct spinlock

2012-11-29 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens ha...@hauke-m.de wrote: IMHO your patch should go upstream and a respective patch should be submitted as well as for these drivers: mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-next