On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> IMHO your patch should go upstream and a respective patch should be
> submitted as well as for these drivers:
>
> mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-next (git::master)$ git grep "struct
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> struct spinlock does not exists on kernel version <= 2.6.32, use
> spinlock_t instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
> ---
> patches/network/67-use_spinlock_t.patch | 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> create mode
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens ha...@hauke-m.de wrote:
struct spinlock does not exists on kernel version = 2.6.32, use
spinlock_t instead.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens ha...@hauke-m.de
---
patches/network/67-use_spinlock_t.patch | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens ha...@hauke-m.de wrote:
IMHO your patch should go upstream and a respective patch should be
submitted as well as for these drivers:
mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-next
4 matches
Mail list logo