On 07/21/2012 04:56 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Of course, the million dollar question is why would using AIO in the
kernel be faster than using AIO in userspace?
Actually for me a more important
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Of course, the million dollar question is why would using AIO in the
>> kernel be faster than using AIO in userspace?
>
> Actually for me a more important question is how does it compare
> with
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Of course, the million dollar question is why would using AIO in the
>> kernel be faster than using AIO in userspace?
>
> Actually for me a more important question is
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Of course, the million dollar question is why would using AIO in the
kernel be faster than using AIO in userspace?
Actually for me a more important
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Of course, the million dollar question is why would using AIO in the
kernel be faster than using AIO in userspace?
Actually for me a more important question is how does it compare
On 07/21/2012 04:56 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Of course, the million dollar question is why would using AIO in the
kernel be faster than using AIO in userspace?
Actually for me a
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Of course, the million dollar question is why would using AIO in the
> kernel be faster than using AIO in userspace?
Actually for me a more important question is how does it compare
with virtio-blk dataplane?
--
MST
--
To
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Asias He writes:
>
> > vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
> >
> > This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
> > improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
> >
Asias He writes:
> vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
>
> This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
> improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
> host completion processing in parallel which gives about 60% performance
>
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
host completion processing in parallel which gives about 60%
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:42AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Of course, the million dollar question is why would using AIO in the
kernel be faster than using AIO in userspace?
Actually for me a more important question is how does it compare
with virtio-blk dataplane?
--
MST
--
To
On 07/18/2012 10:31 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Asias He writes:
On 07/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Asias He writes:
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch
Asias He writes:
> On 07/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Asias He writes:
>>
>>> vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
>>>
>>> This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
>>> improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
>>>
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
On 07/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest
On 07/18/2012 10:31 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
On 07/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug
On 07/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Asias He writes:
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
host completion processing in parallel which
Asias He writes:
> vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
>
> This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
> improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
> host completion processing in parallel which gives about 60% performance
>
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
host completion processing in parallel which gives about 60%
On 07/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Asias He as...@redhat.com writes:
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
host completion processing
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
host completion processing in parallel which gives about 60% performance
improvement compared to Liu Yuan's
vhost-blk is a in kernel virito-blk device accelerator.
This patch is based on Liu Yuan's implementation with various
improvements and bug fixes. Notably, this patch makes guest notify and
host completion processing in parallel which gives about 60% performance
improvement compared to Liu Yuan's
22 matches
Mail list logo
