On 12/11/13 14:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> > +/* callback for device_child_may_wakeup */
>> > +static int __device_child_may_wakeup(struct device *dev, void *c)
>> > +{
>> > + return device_may_wakeup(dev);
>> > +}
> This doesn't have anything to do with children in principle, so please
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 01:52:57 PM srinivas.kandaga...@st.com wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla
>
> This patch introduces device_child_may_wakeup function, which will be
> useful for wrapper or SoC level driver power management code.
> Without this patch each driver has to write this
From: Srinivas Kandagatla
This patch introduces device_child_may_wakeup function, which will be
useful for wrapper or SoC level driver power management code.
Without this patch each driver has to write this same code to get the
functionality.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
From: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandaga...@st.com
This patch introduces device_child_may_wakeup function, which will be
useful for wrapper or SoC level driver power management code.
Without this patch each driver has to write this same code to get the
functionality.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 01:52:57 PM srinivas.kandaga...@st.com wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandaga...@st.com
This patch introduces device_child_may_wakeup function, which will be
useful for wrapper or SoC level driver power management code.
Without this patch each driver
On 12/11/13 14:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
+/* callback for device_child_may_wakeup */
+static int __device_child_may_wakeup(struct device *dev, void *c)
+{
+ return device_may_wakeup(dev);
+}
This doesn't have anything to do with children in principle, so please call
it
6 matches
Mail list logo
