On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
> involved
>
> The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
> is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
> involved
>
> The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
> is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle
On 19 April 2013 11:21, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 19 April 2013 10:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> >> On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> >> > On Thu,
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 11:21 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 19 April 2013 10:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > >> On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > >> >
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 10:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> >> The
On 19 April 2013 10:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> >> The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
> >> involved
> >>
> >> The update of the load of a
On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
>> involved
>>
>> The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the
>> avg_idle
>> is less than
On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
involved
The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the
avg_idle
is less than
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
involved
The update of the load of a rq
On 19 April 2013 10:14, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:14, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 11:21 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:14, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de
On 19 April 2013 11:21, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 19 April 2013 10:14, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 09:49 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On 19 April 2013 06:30, Mike Galbraith efa...@gmx.de
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
involved
The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
involved
The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
> involved
>
> The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
> is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle
The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
involved
The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle duration
alternate, the runnable_avg will not be updated correctly
The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
involved
The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle duration
alternate, the runnable_avg will not be updated correctly
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
involved
The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle
20 matches
Mail list logo
