On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:17 PM, delicious quinoa
> wrote:
>
>> I am wondering about the change in usage of
>> irq_find_mapping/irq_create_mapping. It seems like all the GPIO
>> drivers that use irq domains do it the way I was doing it
>
>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:17 PM, delicious quinoa
wrote:
> I am wondering about the change in usage of
> irq_find_mapping/irq_create_mapping. It seems like all the GPIO
> drivers that use irq domains do it the way I was doing it
It is a well known problems that the kernel contain many bad
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:17 PM, delicious quinoa
delicious.qui...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering about the change in usage of
irq_find_mapping/irq_create_mapping. It seems like all the GPIO
drivers that use irq domains do it the way I was doing it
It is a well known problems that the
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:17 PM, delicious quinoa
delicious.qui...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering about the change in usage of
irq_find_mapping/irq_create_mapping. It seems like all the GPIO
drivers that use irq
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Alan, this is starting to look good. I's like an ACK from a DT
> maintainer on the bindings but can't see anything really controversial
> about them.
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
>
>> +static int
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Alan, this is starting to look good. I's like an ACK from a DT
maintainer on the bindings but can't see anything really controversial
about them.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Alan Tull
Hi Alan, this is starting to look good. I's like an ACK from a DT
maintainer on the bindings but can't see anything really controversial
about them.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> +static int dwapb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> +{
> + struct
Hi Alan, this is starting to look good. I's like an ACK from a DT
maintainer on the bindings but can't see anything really controversial
about them.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Alan Tull delicious.qui...@gmail.com wrote:
+static int dwapb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
From: Jamie Iles
The Synopsys DesignWare block is used in some ARM devices (picoxcell)
and can be configured to provide multiple banks of GPIO pins.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles
Signed-off-by: Alan Tull
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
v11: - Use NULL when checking existence of 'interrupts'
From: Jamie Iles ja...@jamieiles.com
The Synopsys DesignWare block is used in some ARM devices (picoxcell)
and can be configured to provide multiple banks of GPIO pins.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles ja...@jamieiles.com
Signed-off-by: Alan Tull at...@altera.com
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
10 matches
Mail list logo
