From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 05:55:39 -0700
> On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:20 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
>> GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
>> from mv643xx_eth. This is work
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:20 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
> GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
> from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an experimental patch
> provided by Eric Dumazet and
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an experimental patch
provided by Eric Dumazet and Willy Tarreau.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an experimental patch
provided by Eric Dumazet and Willy Tarreau.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:20 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from mv643xx_eth. This is work is based on an experimental patch
provided by Eric Dumazet and
From: Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 05:55:39 -0700
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:20 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
With recent support for GRO, there is no need to keep both LRO and
GRO. This patch therefore removes the deprecated inet_lro support
from
6 matches
Mail list logo
