On 07/07/2015 05:13 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:48:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:37:49PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
>>> On Mi, 2014-11-26 at 19:05 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:48:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:37:49PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
> > On Mi, 2014-11-26 at 19:05 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > > On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:37:49PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
> On Mi, 2014-11-26 at 19:05 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > >> Having a board where the I2C bus locks
> I only stumbled across this after it was merged, with the additional
> ti,has-pfunc property instead of using the compatible string (which
> would be better for a soc-dependent feature). Can we still fix this?
Makes sense to me.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mi, 2014-11-26 at 19:05 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >> Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
> >> that the bus recovery in the
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:37:49PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Mi, 2014-11-26 at 19:05 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Having a board where the I2C bus locks up
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:48:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:37:49PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Mi, 2014-11-26 at 19:05 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200,
On Mi, 2014-11-26 at 19:05 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver
I only stumbled across this after it was merged, with the additional
ti,has-pfunc property instead of using the compatible string (which
would be better for a soc-dependent feature). Can we still fix this?
Makes sense to me.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 07/07/2015 05:13 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:48:52PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:37:49PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Mi, 2014-11-26 at 19:05 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26,
On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
>> that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
>> some boards, because on regular
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
> that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
> some boards, because on regular boards, this will only toggle GPIO
> lines that
Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
some boards, because on regular boards, this will only toggle GPIO
lines that aren't muxed to the actual pins.
The I2C controller on SoCs like da850 (and da830),
Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
some boards, because on regular boards, this will only toggle GPIO
lines that aren't muxed to the actual pins.
The I2C controller on SoCs like da850 (and da830),
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
some boards, because on regular boards, this will only toggle GPIO
lines that aren't
On 11/26/2014 06:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear
that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver will only work on
some boards, because on regular boards, this
16 matches
Mail list logo
