Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Le 2017-02-20 14:56, Linus Walleij a écrit : >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Paul Cercueil >> wrote: >> >>> I was thinking that instead of having one pinctrl-ingenic instance >>> covering

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Le 2017-02-20 14:56, Linus Walleij a écrit : >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Paul Cercueil >> wrote: >> >>> I was thinking that instead of having one pinctrl-ingenic instance >>> covering >>> 0x600 of register space, and 6 instances

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

Le 2017-02-20 14:56, Linus Walleij a écrit : On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: I was thinking that instead of having one pinctrl-ingenic instance covering 0x600 of register space, and 6 instances of gpio-ingenic having 0x100 each, I could just have 6

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

Le 2017-02-20 14:56, Linus Walleij a écrit : On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: I was thinking that instead of having one pinctrl-ingenic instance covering 0x600 of register space, and 6 instances of gpio-ingenic having 0x100 each, I could just have 6 instances of

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > I was thinking that instead of having one pinctrl-ingenic instance covering > 0x600 of register space, and 6 instances of gpio-ingenic having 0x100 each, > I could just have 6 instances of pinctrl-ingenic, each one with

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > I was thinking that instead of having one pinctrl-ingenic instance covering > 0x600 of register space, and 6 instances of gpio-ingenic having 0x100 each, > I could just have 6 instances of pinctrl-ingenic, each one with an instance > of

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

Le 2017-01-31 14:09, Linus Walleij a écrit : On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote: [Rob]: From the overlapping register addresses in the examples and this description, it looks like the pinctrlr and gpio controller are 1 block. If so, then there should

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

Le 2017-01-31 14:09, Linus Walleij a écrit : On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote: [Rob]: From the overlapping register addresses in the examples and this description, it looks like the pinctrlr and gpio controller are 1 block. If so, then there should only be 1 node.

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > [Rob]: >> From the overlapping register addresses in the examples and this >> description, it looks like the pinctrlr and gpio controller are 1 block. >> If so, then there should only be 1 node. > > Well, that's what I

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote: > [Rob]: >> From the overlapping register addresses in the examples and this >> description, it looks like the pinctrlr and gpio controller are 1 block. >> If so, then there should only be 1 node. > > Well, that's what I had until Linus W.

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

Hi, From the overlapping register addresses in the examples and this description, it looks like the pinctrlr and gpio controller are 1 block. If so, then there should only be 1 node. Well, that's what I had until Linus W. just told me to do the opposite: Just pull all these down two

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

Hi, From the overlapping register addresses in the examples and this description, it looks like the pinctrlr and gpio controller are 1 block. If so, then there should only be 1 node. Well, that's what I had until Linus W. just told me to do the opposite: Just pull all these down two

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 07:51:54PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote: > This commit adds documentation for the devicetree bidings of the > pinctrl-ingenic driver, which handles pin configuration and pin > muxing of the Ingenic SoCs currently supported by the Linux kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Paul

Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 07:51:54PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote: > This commit adds documentation for the devicetree bidings of the > pinctrl-ingenic driver, which handles pin configuration and pin > muxing of the Ingenic SoCs currently supported by the Linux kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Paul

[PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

This commit adds documentation for the devicetree bidings of the pinctrl-ingenic driver, which handles pin configuration and pin muxing of the Ingenic SoCs currently supported by the Linux kernel. Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil --- .../bindings/pinctrl/ingenic,pinctrl.txt

[PATCH v3 01/14] Documentation: dt/bindings: Document pinctrl-ingenic

This commit adds documentation for the devicetree bidings of the pinctrl-ingenic driver, which handles pin configuration and pin muxing of the Ingenic SoCs currently supported by the Linux kernel. Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil --- .../bindings/pinctrl/ingenic,pinctrl.txt | 77