On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> > This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just
>> > leaving this up to
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just
> > leaving this up to the arch. But I guess I can at least give you my
> > opinion
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just
> leaving this up to the arch. But I guess I can at least give you my
> opinion :)
However, PCI core people have more knowledge of the issues here than I do.
>
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> From: Vidya Sagar
>
> As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
> is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
> that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
> there is a PCIe device found on the bus
>
>
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Vidya Sagar sagar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vidya Sagar sagar...@gmail.com
As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
there is a PCIe
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just
leaving this up to the arch. But I guess I can at least give you my
opinion :)
However, PCI core people have more knowledge of the issues here than I do.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just
leaving this up to the arch. But I guess I can at least give you my
opinion :)
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just
Anyone ???
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> From: Vidya Sagar
>
> As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
> is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
> that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
> there is a PCIe device found on the
Anyone ???
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Vidya Sagar sagar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vidya Sagar sagar...@gmail.com
As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
there is
From: Vidya Sagar
As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
there is a PCIe device found on the bus
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar
---
v4:
* initialized 'has_pcie_dev' to
From: Vidya Sagar sagar...@gmail.com
As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
there is a PCIe device found on the bus
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar sagar...@gmail.com
---
v4:
As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
there is a PCIe device found on the bus
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar
---
v4:
* initialized 'has_pcie_dev' to 'false'
v3:
* removed
As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
there is a PCIe device found on the bus
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar vid...@nvidia.com
---
v4:
* initialized 'has_pcie_dev' to 'false'
As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
there is a PCIe device found on the bus
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar
---
v4:
* initialized 'has_pcie_dev' to 'false'
v3:
* removed
As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature
is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print
that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when
there is a PCIe device found on the bus
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar vid...@nvidia.com
---
v4:
* initialized 'has_pcie_dev' to 'false'
16 matches
Mail list logo
