um);
> No, these two not right... Consider someone seeing this message will try to
> grep "transfer complete stopping channel" and will fail miserable to find the
> offending line. And this makes it uglier...
>
> Also I believe checkpatch has this check, don't you run that before sending
> patches?
Sorry I did r
the string split and a generate a new patch below, Thanks.
---8---
From: Joel Fernandes jo...@ti.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/6] dma: edma: Write out and handle MAX_NR_SG at a given
time
Process SG-elements in batches of MAX_NR_SG if they are greater
than MAX_NR_SG. Due to this, at any given time only
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Process SG-elements in batches of MAX_NR_SG if they are greater
> than MAX_NR_SG. Due to this, at any given time only those many
> slots will be used in the given channel no matter how long the
> scatter list is. We keep track of
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
Process SG-elements in batches of MAX_NR_SG if they are greater
than MAX_NR_SG. Due to this, at any given time only those many
slots will be used in the given channel no matter how long the
scatter list is. We keep track of how
Process SG-elements in batches of MAX_NR_SG if they are greater
than MAX_NR_SG. Due to this, at any given time only those many
slots will be used in the given channel no matter how long the
scatter list is. We keep track of how much has been written
inorder to process the next batch of elements in
Process SG-elements in batches of MAX_NR_SG if they are greater
than MAX_NR_SG. Due to this, at any given time only those many
slots will be used in the given channel no matter how long the
scatter list is. We keep track of how much has been written
inorder to process the next batch of elements in
6 matches
Mail list logo
