Hey,
So, I've done a couple hundred hibernate resume cycles with v5 of the
patch and so far it looks good. I'll let you know if I hit any bugs in
more typical usage over the coming week.
Thanks,
Logan
On 30/06/16 10:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Hey,
So, I've done a couple hundred hibernate resume cycles with v5 of the
patch and so far it looks good. I'll let you know if I hit any bugs in
more typical usage over the coming week.
Thanks,
Logan
On 30/06/16 10:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Logan Gunthorpe
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:11:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Logan Gunthorpe reports that hibernation stopped working reliably for
> him after commit ab76f7b4ab23 (x86/mm: Set NX on gap between __ex_table
> and rodata).
>
> That
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:11:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Logan Gunthorpe reports that hibernation stopped working reliably for
> him after commit ab76f7b4ab23 (x86/mm: Set NX on gap between __ex_table
> and rodata).
>
> That turns out to be a consequence
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Logan Gunthorpe reports that hibernation stopped working reliably for
him after commit ab76f7b4ab23 (x86/mm: Set NX on gap between __ex_table
and rodata).
That turns out to be a consequence of a long-standing issue with the
64-bit image
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Logan Gunthorpe reports that hibernation stopped working reliably for
him after commit ab76f7b4ab23 (x86/mm: Set NX on gap between __ex_table
and rodata).
That turns out to be a consequence of a long-standing issue with the
64-bit image restoration code on x86, which is
6 matches
Mail list logo