在 2022/6/3 9:07, Shiyang Ruan 写道:
在 2022/6/3 2:56, Andrew Morton 写道:
On Sun, 8 May 2022 22:36:06 +0800 Shiyang Ruan
wrote:
This is a combination of two patchsets:
1.fsdax-rmap:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220419045045.1664996-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
2.fsdax-reflink:
在 2022/6/3 2:56, Andrew Morton 写道:
On Sun, 8 May 2022 22:36:06 +0800 Shiyang Ruan wrote:
This is a combination of two patchsets:
1.fsdax-rmap:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220419045045.1664996-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
2.fsdax-reflink:
On Sun, 8 May 2022 22:36:06 +0800 Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> This is a combination of two patchsets:
> 1.fsdax-rmap:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220419045045.1664996-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
> 2.fsdax-reflink:
>
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:18:09 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:42:13PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any other work I should do with these two patchsets? I think they
> > are good for now. So... since the 5.19-rc1 is coming, could the
> >
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:42:13PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any other work I should do with these two patchsets? I think they
> are good for now. So... since the 5.19-rc1 is coming, could the
> notify_failure() part be merged as your plan?
Hmm. I don't see any of the
Hi,
Is there any other work I should do with these two patchsets? I think
they are good for now. So... since the 5.19-rc1 is coming, could the
notify_failure() part be merged as your plan?
--
Thanks,
Ruan.
在 2022/5/12 20:27, Shiyang Ruan 写道:
在 2022/5/11 23:46, Dan Williams 写道:
On
在 2022/5/11 23:46, Dan Williams 写道:
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:21 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote:
Oan Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:24:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2022 19:43:01 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:28:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue,
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:21 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>
> Oan Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:24:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2022 19:43:01 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:28:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 10 May 2022
Oan Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:24:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 19:43:01 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong"
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:28:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > It'll need
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:24:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 19:43:01 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong"
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:28:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > It'll need to
On Tue, 10 May 2022 19:43:01 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:28:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > > > really matters where
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:20:57PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:29 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > > > really matters where al
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:29 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> wrote:
>
> > > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > > really matters where al long as it's merged into the xfs for-next
> > > tree so it gets filesystem
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:28:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> wrote:
>
> > > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > > really matters where al long as it's merged into the xfs for-next
> > > tree so it gets
On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
wrote:
> > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > really matters where al long as it's merged into the xfs for-next
> > tree so it gets filesystem test coverage...
>
> So how about let the notify_failure() bits go
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 06:55:50PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> [ add Andrew ]
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:49 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:03:52PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:36:06PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > > > This is a
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:03:52PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:36:06PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > This is a combination of two patchsets:
> > 1.fsdax-rmap:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220419045045.1664996-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
> >
[ add Andrew ]
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:49 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:03:52PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:36:06PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > > This is a combination of two patchsets:
> > > 1.fsdax-rmap:
> > >
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:36:06PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> This is a combination of two patchsets:
> 1.fsdax-rmap:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220419045045.1664996-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
> 2.fsdax-reflink:
>
The patch numbering due looks odd due to the combination of the
two series. But otherwise this looks good to me modulo the one
minor nitpick.
This is a combination of two patchsets:
1.fsdax-rmap:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220419045045.1664996-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
2.fsdax-reflink:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20210928062311.4012070-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
Changes since v13 of fsdax-rmap:
1. Fixed mistakes
21 matches
Mail list logo
