On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this one is OK with everyone.
Looks good to me, all applied.
It's in jberg/mac80211-next.git rfkill-gpio-cleanups branch, in case
anybody needs this separately. John isn't taking pull requests for -next
until after -rc1,
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 09:32 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Stephen! Are you expecting any changes to board-paz00.c in this kernel
> > cycle? If not, I think it would be easiest if Johannes, you take the
> > whole set. What do you guys think?
>
> I can't predict the future, but the chances are
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 09:32 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
Stephen! Are you expecting any changes to board-paz00.c in this kernel
cycle? If not, I think it would be easiest if Johannes, you take the
whole set. What do you guys think?
I can't predict the future, but the chances are pretty
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Hi,
I hope this one is OK with everyone.
Looks good to me, all applied.
It's in jberg/mac80211-next.git rfkill-gpio-cleanups branch, in case
anybody needs this separately. John isn't taking pull requests for -next
until after -rc1, at
On 04/09/2014 04:01 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:37:55AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>> I hope this one is OK with everyone.
>>
>> It's fine with me. Are you expecting me to pick up any of these
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:37:55AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > I hope this one is OK with everyone.
>
> It's fine with me. Are you expecting me to pick up any of these patches,
> or do you want them to go through some other
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:37:55AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
I hope this one is OK with everyone.
It's fine with me. Are you expecting me to pick up any of these patches,
or do you want them to go through some other tree?
On 04/09/2014 04:01 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:37:55AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
I hope this one is OK with everyone.
It's fine with me. Are you expecting me to pick up any of these patches,
or do
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this one is OK with everyone.
It's fine with me. Are you expecting me to pick up any of these patches,
or do you want them to go through some other tree? Either way is fine
with me, but the first patch looks like
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Hi,
I hope this one is OK with everyone.
It's fine with me. Are you expecting me to pick up any of these patches,
or do you want them to go through some other tree? Either way is fine
with me, but the first patch looks like something I
Negative number of added lines, temporary string buffers removal, and
use of the gpiod interface: lots of stuff to like here!
Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Heikki Krogerus
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this one is OK with everyone.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Instead of
Negative number of added lines, temporary string buffers removal, and
use of the gpiod interface: lots of stuff to like here!
Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot acour...@nvidia.com
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Heikki Krogerus
heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi,
I hope this one is OK with
Hi,
I hope this one is OK with everyone.
Changes since v2:
- Instead of changing the driver to use only indexed gpios, just
hard-coding the names.
Changes since v1:
- Removed the gpio entries from arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
Heikki Krogerus (5):
ARM: tegra: remove obsolete gpio
Hi,
I hope this one is OK with everyone.
Changes since v2:
- Instead of changing the driver to use only indexed gpios, just
hard-coding the names.
Changes since v1:
- Removed the gpio entries from arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c
Heikki Krogerus (5):
ARM: tegra: remove obsolete gpio
14 matches
Mail list logo
