On 7 November 2012 13:26, Michael Wang wrote:
> It's the user nice value I suppose, so it should be reversed when we are
> talking about weight.
Ahh.. I knew it .. How can i miss it.
Sorry for the noise :(
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On 11/07/2012 03:49 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi, Viresh
> Hi Ingo/Peter,
>
> I am trying to understand the complex scheduler code and just found
> something incorrect (maybe i am not reading it well):
>
> File: kernel/sched/fair.c
>
> static void
> prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
Hi Ingo/Peter,
I am trying to understand the complex scheduler code and just found
something incorrect (maybe i am not reading it well):
File: kernel/sched/fair.c
static void
prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
{
if (!p->se.on_rq)
return;
Hi Ingo/Peter,
I am trying to understand the complex scheduler code and just found
something incorrect (maybe i am not reading it well):
File: kernel/sched/fair.c
static void
prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
{
if (!p-se.on_rq)
return;
On 11/07/2012 03:49 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi, Viresh
Hi Ingo/Peter,
I am trying to understand the complex scheduler code and just found
something incorrect (maybe i am not reading it well):
File: kernel/sched/fair.c
static void
prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
On 7 November 2012 13:26, Michael Wang wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
It's the user nice value I suppose, so it should be reversed when we are
talking about weight.
Ahh.. I knew it .. How can i miss it.
Sorry for the noise :(
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
6 matches
Mail list logo
