Hi!
> >>> Ok, plus there's already computing standard called "arc".
> >>>
> >>> https://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/ARC
> >>>
> >>> What about calling the architecture "sarc" or "syarc" ?
> >> I think it would be best use of everybody's time if you could focus on
> >> the technical content of the
On Saturday 19 January 2013 01:16 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2012-11-20 19:47:58, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:29 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
>
>
Hi!
> > Yeah, and it is best use of reviewers time to confuse them with
> > one-letter difference to very popular architecture... and use three
> > letter acronym that was already taken.
> >
> > In this state, I hope your port never gets merged. Yes, I got used to
> > do cd a/ar.
>
> You
Hi!
Yeah, and it is best use of reviewers time to confuse them with
one-letter difference to very popular architecture... and use three
letter acronym that was already taken.
In this state, I hope your port never gets merged. Yes, I got used to
do cd atab/artab.
You already lost
On Saturday 19 January 2013 01:16 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2012-11-20 19:47:58, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:29 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Hi!
Ok, plus there's already computing standard called arc.
https://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/ARC
What about calling the architecture sarc or syarc ?
I think it would be best use of everybody's time if you could focus on
the technical content of the port rather than the name. It has
On Friday 18 January 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Yeah, and it is best use of reviewers time to confuse them with
> one-letter difference to very popular architecture... and use three
> letter acronym that was already taken.
>
> In this state, I hope your port never gets merged. Yes, I got used to
On Tue 2012-11-20 19:47:58, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:29 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>>
> >>> https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
> >>>
> >>> All
On Tue 2012-11-20 19:47:58, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:29 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
All comments/criticisms are welcome !
Huh.
On Friday 18 January 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
Yeah, and it is best use of reviewers time to confuse them with
one-letter difference to very popular architecture... and use three
letter acronym that was already taken.
In this state, I hope your port never gets merged. Yes, I got used to
do
On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:29 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
>>>
>>> All comments/criticisms are welcome !
>> Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So
On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
> >
> > All comments/criticisms are welcome !
>
> Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So similar that it took me
> 10 minutes to figure out. I guess
On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:17 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
>>
>> All comments/criticisms are welcome !
> Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So similar that it took me
> 10 minutes to figure out. I guess
Hi!
> https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
>
> All comments/criticisms are welcome !
Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So similar that it took me
10 minutes to figure out. I guess theres no alternate name arc could
use?
Hi!
https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
All comments/criticisms are welcome !
Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So similar that it took me
10 minutes to figure out. I guess theres no alternate name arc could
use?
On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:17 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
All comments/criticisms are welcome !
Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So similar that it took me
10 minutes to figure out. I guess theres no
On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
All comments/criticisms are welcome !
Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So similar that it took me
10 minutes to figure out. I guess theres no
On Tuesday 20 November 2012 07:29 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2012-11-20 14:47:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
https://raw.github.com/vineetgarc/publish/master/ELCE-2012-ARC-Linux.pdf
All comments/criticisms are welcome !
Huh. arch/arc is very similar to arch/arm. So similar that it took
Hi Arnd,
Thanks for your valuable comments I will rework the port.
P.S. Sorry for top-posting.
Thanks,
Vineet
On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> This patchset based off-of 3.7-rc3, introduces the Linux kernel port to
> ARC700 processor family (750D and 770D) from Synopsys.
>
Hi Arnd,
Thanks for your valuable comments I will rework the port.
P.S. Sorry for top-posting.
Thanks,
Vineet
On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Vineet Gupta wrote:
This patchset based off-of 3.7-rc3, introduces the Linux kernel port to
ARC700 processor family (750D and 770D) from Synopsys.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patchset based off-of 3.7-rc3, introduces the Linux kernel port to
> ARC700 processor family (750D and 770D) from Synopsys.
We've been using the port for 6 month now at Ezchip running on top of
FPGA in 4 way SMP configuration
On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> This patchset based off-of 3.7-rc3, introduces the Linux kernel port to
> ARC700 processor family (750D and 770D) from Synopsys.
>
> ARC700 is highly configurable and power efficient 32-bit RISC core with MMU.
> It is embedded in SoCs deployed
Hi,
This patchset based off-of 3.7-rc3, introduces the Linux kernel port to
ARC700 processor family (750D and 770D) from Synopsys.
ARC700 is highly configurable and power efficient 32-bit RISC core with MMU.
It is embedded in SoCs deployed in TV Set Top boxes, Digital Media Players,
all the way
Hi,
This patchset based off-of 3.7-rc3, introduces the Linux kernel port to
ARC700 processor family (750D and 770D) from Synopsys.
ARC700 is highly configurable and power efficient 32-bit RISC core with MMU.
It is embedded in SoCs deployed in TV Set Top boxes, Digital Media Players,
all the way
On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Vineet Gupta wrote:
This patchset based off-of 3.7-rc3, introduces the Linux kernel port to
ARC700 processor family (750D and 770D) from Synopsys.
ARC700 is highly configurable and power efficient 32-bit RISC core with MMU.
It is embedded in SoCs deployed in TV
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Vineet Gupta
vineet.gup...@synopsys.com wrote:
Hi,
This patchset based off-of 3.7-rc3, introduces the Linux kernel port to
ARC700 processor family (750D and 770D) from Synopsys.
We've been using the port for 6 month now at Ezchip running on top of
FPGA in 4
26 matches
Mail list logo
