Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > > > I know that with MPS 1.4, the USB controller finds itself at an > > unshared interrupt 19. I can't reboot at the moment to check. > > > lspci -vxxx -s 00:07.0 > > the APIC sits in the southbridge. > the low 2 bits of offset 0x58 must be set [route USB IRQ to

Re: [lkml]Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread Manfred Spraul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) > Subsystem: Unknown device 0925:1234 > Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 > I/O ports at a000 [size=32] > Capabilities: [80] Power

Re: [lkml]Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread thunder7
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:21:55PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > > I know that with MPS 1.4, the USB controller finds itself at an > > unshared interrupt 19. I can't reboot at the moment to check. > > > lspci -vxxx -s 00:07.0 > > the APIC sits in the southbridge. > the low 2 bits of

Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread Manfred Spraul
> > I know that with MPS 1.4, the USB controller finds itself at an > unshared interrupt 19. I can't reboot at the moment to check. > lspci -vxxx -s 00:07.0 the APIC sits in the southbridge. the low 2 bits of offset 0x58 must be set [route USB IRQ to APIC], and lspci -vx -s 00:07.2 offset

Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread thunder7
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:06:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:39:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What information would be necessary to debug this? > > Which kernel version? > > greg k-h > 2.4.5-ac4, but I rebooted in 2.4.4 and it did the same. I'll try and

Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread thunder7
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:06:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:39:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What information would be necessary to debug this? Which kernel version? greg k-h 2.4.5-ac4, but I rebooted in 2.4.4 and it did the same. I'll try and add some

Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread Manfred Spraul
I know that with MPS 1.4, the USB controller finds itself at an unshared interrupt 19. I can't reboot at the moment to check. lspci -vxxx -s 00:07.0 the APIC sits in the southbridge. the low 2 bits of offset 0x58 must be set [route USB IRQ to APIC], and lspci -vx -s 00:07.2 offset 0x3C

Re: [lkml]Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread thunder7
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:21:55PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: I know that with MPS 1.4, the USB controller finds itself at an unshared interrupt 19. I can't reboot at the moment to check. lspci -vxxx -s 00:07.0 the APIC sits in the southbridge. the low 2 bits of offset 0x58 must

Re: [lkml]Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread Manfred Spraul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Unknown device 0925:1234 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5 I/O ports at a000 [size=32] Capabilities: [80] Power

Re: [lkml]Re: interrupt problem with MPS 1.4 / not with MPS 1.1 ?

2001-05-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Manfred Spraul wrote: I know that with MPS 1.4, the USB controller finds itself at an unshared interrupt 19. I can't reboot at the moment to check. lspci -vxxx -s 00:07.0 the APIC sits in the southbridge. the low 2 bits of offset 0x58 must be set [route USB IRQ to APIC], and