Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread Joey Hess
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > maximilian attems wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction. >>> >>> If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it >>> would speed things up. >> >> cp -l

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Thought some more about this, and since this probably means gcc will generate this for userspace code as well nowadays, tm5800 should probably be downgraded to a 586-class machine. Hence the Linux policy of promoting it to a 686-class machine for having CMOV is actually incorrect, it doesn't

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Are you sure that build matches the bug report? urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer 2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3 The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Are you sure that build matches the bug report? urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer 2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3 The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Are you sure that build matches the bug report? urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer 2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3 > The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel, > specifically inside

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction. If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would speed things up. cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_686/vmlinux

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction. > > If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would > speed things up. cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_686/vmlinux ~/public_html/

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread Joey Hess
maximilian attems wrote: > on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor. FWIW, I misremembered the model number. It's a not-so-shiny P2110. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: sure, ack. so i'll circumvent bugzilla and add the new x86 maintainers on cc to let them know about the 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc1 boot error on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor. http://bugs.debian.org/464962 686 config attached. INT 6 is #UD,

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:52:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > maximilian attems wrote: > > thanks for quick feedback, have prebuild 2.6.25-rc1-git2 > > (they contain the security fix, but don't seem to suspend here) > > anyway please test for boot > > ->

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: sure, ack. so i'll circumvent bugzilla and add the new x86 maintainers on cc to let them know about the 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc1 boot error on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor. http://bugs.debian.org/464962 686 config attached. INT 6 is #UD,

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Are you sure that build matches the bug report? urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer 2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3 The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread Joey Hess
H. Peter Anvin wrote: maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction. If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would speed things up. cp -l

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Are you sure that build matches the bug report? urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer 2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3 The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction. If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would speed things up. cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_686/vmlinux

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction. If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would speed things up. cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_686/vmlinux ~/public_html/

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:52:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: maximilian attems wrote: thanks for quick feedback, have prebuild 2.6.25-rc1-git2 (they contain the security fix, but don't seem to suspend here) anyway please test for boot -

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Thought some more about this, and since this probably means gcc will generate this for userspace code as well nowadays, tm5800 should probably be downgraded to a 586-class machine. Hence the Linux policy of promoting it to a 686-class machine for having CMOV is actually incorrect, it doesn't

Re: Bug#464962: immediate crash on boot on TM5800

2008-02-12 Thread Joey Hess
maximilian attems wrote: on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor. FWIW, I misremembered the model number. It's a not-so-shiny P2110. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature