> It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
> that outlines some of the major things that would have changed so I can
> update the module accordingly?
Within a week or so, "Linux Device Drivers" second edition should hit the
shelves. It will also hit the net, but
- Original Message -
From: "Christoph Hellwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Horst von Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: Making a module 2.4 compatible
> Hi Horst,
>
> In arti
- Original Message -
From: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: Making a module 2.4 compatible
Hi Horst,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Seconded! There are a few
It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
that outlines some of the major things that would have changed so I can
update the module accordingly?
BlatantSelfPromotion
Within a week or so, Linux Device Drivers second edition should hit the
shelves. It will also hit
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Timur Tabi wrote:
> ** Reply to message from James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 23
> Jun 2001 22:10:58 -0700
>
>
> > It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
> > that outlines some of the major things that would have changed so I can
> >
** Reply to message from James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 23
Jun 2001 22:10:58 -0700
> It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
> that outlines some of the major things that would have changed so I can
> update the module accordingly?
Unfortunately, no.
Hi Horst,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Seconded! There are a few users of iBCS around here, who _need_ the
> functionality and don't get it with 2.4.x (in this case, Red Hat 7.1). Or
> is there a replacement for it?
Take a look at inux-abi:
http://linux-abi.sourceforge.net
James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have a kernel module for a robot that was developed for
> the 2.0 and 2.2 kernels and does not work under 2.4.
> Unfortunately, the company that made it is not in business anymore.
> It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
>
James Lamanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have a kernel module for a robot that was developed for
the 2.0 and 2.2 kernels and does not work under 2.4.
Unfortunately, the company that made it is not in business anymore.
It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
that
Hi Horst,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Seconded! There are a few users of iBCS around here, who _need_ the
functionality and don't get it with 2.4.x (in this case, Red Hat 7.1). Or
is there a replacement for it?
Take a look at inux-abi:
http://linux-abi.sourceforge.net
** Reply to message from James Lamanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 23
Jun 2001 22:10:58 -0700
It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
that outlines some of the major things that would have changed so I can
update the module accordingly?
Unfortunately, no. But if
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Timur Tabi wrote:
** Reply to message from James Lamanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 23
Jun 2001 22:10:58 -0700
It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
that outlines some of the major things that would have changed so I can
update the
I have a kernel module for a robot that was developed for
the 2.0 and 2.2 kernels and does not work under 2.4.
Unfortunately, the company that made it is not in business anymore.
It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
that outlines some of the major things that would
I have a kernel module for a robot that was developed for
the 2.0 and 2.2 kernels and does not work under 2.4.
Unfortunately, the company that made it is not in business anymore.
It would be nice to have it working under 2.4, so is there someplace
that outlines some of the major things that would
14 matches
Mail list logo
