On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 8:52 PM Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:42:24PM +, Mirea, Bogdan-Stefan wrote:
> > Hello Sascha,
> >
> > On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:30 PM Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > As John already said, there's the read_boot_clock64() interface which
> > > should
On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 8:52 PM Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:42:24PM +, Mirea, Bogdan-Stefan wrote:
> > Hello Sascha,
> >
> > On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:30 PM Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > As John already said, there's the read_boot_clock64() interface which
> > > should
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:42:24PM +, Mirea, Bogdan-Stefan wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:30 PM Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > As John already said, there's the read_boot_clock64() interface which
> > should be used here.
> > By using the read_boot_clock64() interface you
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:42:24PM +, Mirea, Bogdan-Stefan wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:30 PM Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > As John already said, there's the read_boot_clock64() interface which
> > should be used here.
> > By using the read_boot_clock64() interface you
Hello Sascha,
On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:30 PM Sascha Hauer wrote:
> As John already said, there's the read_boot_clock64() interface which
> should be used here.
> By using the read_boot_clock64() interface you can make sure that you
> only provide the functionality when it's actually supposed
Hello Sascha,
On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:30 PM Sascha Hauer wrote:
> As John already said, there's the read_boot_clock64() interface which
> should be used here.
> By using the read_boot_clock64() interface you can make sure that you
> only provide the functionality when it's actually supposed
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:22:29AM +, Mirea, Bogdan-Stefan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any input on this topic?
As John already said, there's the read_boot_clock64() interface which
should be used here.
In your patch you provide a generic option (BOOT_TIME_PRESERVE) which
only works as expected in
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:22:29AM +, Mirea, Bogdan-Stefan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any input on this topic?
As John already said, there's the read_boot_clock64() interface which
should be used here.
In your patch you provide a generic option (BOOT_TIME_PRESERVE) which
only works as expected in
Hello,
Any input on this topic?
Kind Regards,
Bogdan
On Thursday, May 04, 2017 1:55 PM Bogdan Mirea wrote:
>
> Hi Oleksij,
>
> On Thursday, May 04, 2017 12:27 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Hi Bogdan,
> >
> > are there any example what and how bootloader should do to provide
> > correct
Hello,
Any input on this topic?
Kind Regards,
Bogdan
On Thursday, May 04, 2017 1:55 PM Bogdan Mirea wrote:
>
> Hi Oleksij,
>
> On Thursday, May 04, 2017 12:27 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Hi Bogdan,
> >
> > are there any example what and how bootloader should do to provide
> > correct
Hi Oleksij,
On Thursday, May 04, 2017 12:27 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> are there any example what and how bootloader should do to provide
> correct values?
I will give you an example with a real behavior on Renesas RCAR Gen3
Salvator-x:
We have an ARM64 SOC with the following
Hi Oleksij,
On Thursday, May 04, 2017 12:27 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> are there any example what and how bootloader should do to provide
> correct values?
I will give you an example with a real behavior on Renesas RCAR Gen3
Salvator-x:
We have an ARM64 SOC with the following
Hi Bogdan,
are there any example what and how bootloader should do to provide
correct values?
On 05/03/2017 12:59 PM, Bogdan Mirea wrote:
This option enables Boot Time Preservation between Bootloader and
Linux Kernel. It is based on the idea that the Bootloader (or any
other early firmware)
Hi Bogdan,
are there any example what and how bootloader should do to provide
correct values?
On 05/03/2017 12:59 PM, Bogdan Mirea wrote:
This option enables Boot Time Preservation between Bootloader and
Linux Kernel. It is based on the idea that the Bootloader (or any
other early firmware)
14 matches
Mail list logo