On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
wrote:
> Hi Duc,
>
> On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>>>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
wrote:
> Hi Duc,
>
> On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
> wrote:
>> Hi Duc,
>>
>> On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
On Thu,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
> wrote:
>> Hi Duc,
>>
>> On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12:24PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Duc,
>> >
>> > On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12:24PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Duc,
>> >
>> > On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12:24PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
> wrote:
> > Hi Duc,
> >
> > On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12:24PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
> wrote:
> > Hi Duc,
> >
> > On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12:24PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Duc,
>> >
>> > On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12:24PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Duc,
>> >
>> > On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
> wrote:
>> Hi Duc,
>>
>> On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
On Thu,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
> wrote:
>> Hi Duc,
>>
>> On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
wrote:
> Hi Duc,
>
> On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>>>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Christopher Covington
wrote:
> Hi Duc,
>
> On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM
Hi Duc,
On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
From:
Hi Duc,
On 06/20/2016 05:42 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
From: Tomasz Nowicki
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
> >> From: Tomasz Nowicki
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:37:02PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
> >> From: Tomasz Nowicki
> >>
> >> pci_generic_ecam_ops is used by default. Since there are
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Nowicki
>>
>> pci_generic_ecam_ops is used by default. Since there are platforms
>> which have
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Nowicki
>>
>> pci_generic_ecam_ops is used by default. Since there are platforms
>> which have non-compliant ECAM space we need to overwrite these
nux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] ARM64/PCI: Start using quirks handling
>> for ACPI based PCI host controller
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
>>> From: Tomasz Nowicki <t...@semihalf.co
nux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] ARM64/PCI: Start using quirks handling
>> for ACPI based PCI host controller
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
>>> From: Tomasz Nowicki
>>>
>>>
rk Salter; Suravee Suthikulpanit;
> Jayachandran C; David Daney; Robert Richter; Hanjun Guo; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org; Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon; Bjorn Helgaas;
> Ganapatrao Kulkarni; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] ARM64/PCI: Start using quirks
rk Salter; Suravee Suthikulpanit;
> Jayachandran C; David Daney; Robert Richter; Hanjun Guo; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org; Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon; Bjorn Helgaas;
> Ganapatrao Kulkarni; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] ARM64/PCI: Start using quirks
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
> From: Tomasz Nowicki
>
> pci_generic_ecam_ops is used by default. Since there are platforms
> which have non-compliant ECAM space we need to overwrite these
> accessors prior to PCI buses enumeration. In
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
> From: Tomasz Nowicki
>
> pci_generic_ecam_ops is used by default. Since there are platforms
> which have non-compliant ECAM space we need to overwrite these
> accessors prior to PCI buses enumeration. In order to do that
>
26 matches
Mail list logo