Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/20 9:37), Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 20:20 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> >>> Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't >>> work, >>> because the messages are printed by

Re: Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 20:20 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't > > work, > > because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe > > blacklist.

Re: Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't > work, > because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe > blacklist. > So, reproducing it is just enabling CONFIG_KPROBES and boot it.

Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/19 18:45), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > On 06/19/2014 12:56 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: >>> On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

On 06/19/2014 12:56 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: >> On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>> (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael

Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900,

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: >> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>> (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Ping? > > I

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16

Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

On 06/19/2014 12:56 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: On

Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/19 18:45), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: On 06/19/2014 12:56 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 15:40), Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: On 06/19/2014 10:22 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

Re: Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't work, because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe blacklist. So, reproducing it is just enabling CONFIG_KPROBES and boot it. Well, we don't get

Re: Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 20:20 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't work, because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe blacklist. So, reproducing it is

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/20 9:37), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 20:20 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/19 20:01), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ah, those messages should be shown in dmesg when booting if it doesn't work, because the messages are printed by initialization process of kprobe

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? >>> >

Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> Ping? > >> > >> I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? > > > >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h

Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> Ping? >> >> I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? > >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h >>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h >>> index bfb6ded..8b89d65

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Ping? > > I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h > > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h > > index bfb6ded..8b89d65 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h > >

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h index bfb6ded..8b89d65 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h +++

Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h index bfb6ded..8b89d65 100644 ---

Re: Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

(2014/06/19 10:30), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 17:46 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: (2014/06/18 16:56), Michael Ellerman wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? diff --git

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Ping? > > I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? > > (2014/05/30 12:18), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the >> entry address of the function, but the address of function >>

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote: Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? (2014/05/30 12:18), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the entry address of the function, but the

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix "Failed to find blacklist" error on ia64 and ppc64

Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? (2014/05/30 12:18), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the > entry address of the function, but the address of function > discriptor (which contains the entry address and misc > data.) Since

Re: [RFT PATCH -next v3] [BUGFIX] kprobes: Fix Failed to find blacklist error on ia64 and ppc64

Ping? I guess this should go to 3.16 branch, shouldn't it? (2014/05/30 12:18), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the entry address of the function, but the address of function discriptor (which contains the entry address and misc data.) Since the