rg; Leon
> Romanovsky
> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 29 (mlx5)
>
> On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 21:48 +, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Saeed Mahameed
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 2:32 PM
> > &
rg; Haiyang Zhang
> >
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; Leon
> > Romanovsky
> > Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 29 (mlx5)
> >
> > On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 12:55 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 8/29/19 12:54 PM, Ran
rg; Leon
> Romanovsky
> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 29 (mlx5)
>
> On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 12:55 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 8/29/19 12:54 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 8/29/19 4:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
&
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 12:55 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/29/19 12:54 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 8/29/19 4:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Changes since 20190828:
> > >
> >
> > on x86_64:
> > when CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV=m
>
> and CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV_INTERFACE=m
>
On 8/29/19 12:54 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/29/19 4:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20190828:
>>
>
>
> on x86_64:
> when CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV=m
and CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV_INTERFACE=m
> and mxlx5 is builtin (=y).
>
> ld: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.o:
On 8/29/19 4:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190828:
>
on x86_64:
when CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV=m
and mxlx5 is builtin (=y).
ld: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.o: in function `mlx5_unload':
main.c:(.text+0x5d): undefined reference to `mlx5_hv_vhca_cleanup'
Hi all,
Changes since 20190828:
Added tree: smack
The vfs tree changed its conflict against the ceph tree.
The net-next tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
The drm-misc tree lost its build failure.
The regulator tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
Hi all,
Changes since 20180828:
Removed tree: libata (merged into the block tree)
Dropped trees: xarray, ida (temporarily)
The spi tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180828.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 875
1002 files changed, 29529 insertions(+),
Hi all,
Changes since 20180828:
Removed tree: libata (merged into the block tree)
Dropped trees: xarray, ida (temporarily)
The spi tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180828.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 875
1002 files changed, 29529 insertions(+),
Hi all,
Changes since 20170828:
The nfsd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20170824.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
a commit.
The md tree gained a conflict against
Hi all,
Changes since 20170828:
The nfsd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20170824.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
a commit.
The md tree gained a conflict against
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:15:52PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c: In function 'sn_cpu_init':
> > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:632:13: error: lvalue required as left operand
> > of assignment
> > make[1]: ***
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:15:52PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c: In function 'sn_cpu_init':
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:632:13: error: lvalue required as left operand
of assignment
make[1]: ***
On 09/01/2014 02:15 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c: In function 'sn_cpu_init':
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:632:13: error: lvalue required as left operand of
assignment
make[1]: *** [arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
make:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c: In function 'sn_cpu_init':
> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:632:13: error: lvalue required as left operand of
> assignment
> make[1]: *** [arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.o] Error 2
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:07:13PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I will be on vacation for the next week, so the next linux-next that I
> will release will be next-20140908. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> Changes since 20140828:
>
> The staging tree still had its build failure
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:07:13PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I will be on vacation for the next week, so the next linux-next that I
will release will be next-20140908. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Changes since 20140828:
The staging tree still had its build failure for
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c: In function 'sn_cpu_init':
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:632:13: error: lvalue required as left operand of
assignment
make[1]: *** [arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.o] Error 2
On 09/01/2014 02:15 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c: In function 'sn_cpu_init':
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.c:632:13: error: lvalue required as left operand of
assignment
make[1]: *** [arch/ia64/sn/kernel/setup.o] Error 1
make:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:07:13PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I will be on vacation for the next week, so the next linux-next that I
> will release will be next-20140908. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I'm going to try to cover this with the usual reduced service so
hopefully there should
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:07:13PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
I will be on vacation for the next week, so the next linux-next that I
will release will be next-20140908. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I'm going to try to cover this with the usual reduced service so
hopefully there should be
Hi all,
I will be on vacation for the next week, so the next linux-next that I
will release will be next-20140908. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Changes since 20140828:
The staging tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
fix patch.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):
Hi all,
I will be on vacation for the next week, so the next linux-next that I
will release will be next-20140908. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Changes since 20140828:
The staging tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
fix patch.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):
Hi all,
Changes since 20130828:
Removed tree: memblock (its job was done)
The v4l-dvb tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm tree.
The pinctrl tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the
Hi all,
Changes since 20130828:
Removed tree: memblock (its job was done)
The v4l-dvb tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm tree.
The pinctrl tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the
25 matches
Mail list logo
