On Friday 15 June 2007 01:38:41 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 15, 2007, Bron Gondwana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#define Dell CFG_FAVOURITE_VENDOR
A Dell desktop machine is a piece of hardware. The manufacturer has the
source code (hypothetically) to the BIOS. The BIOS is required for the
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
malc wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[..snip..]
Now integral load matches the one obtained via the accurate method.
However the report for individual cores are of by around 20% percent.
I think I missed some of the context, is
Stephen,
Thank you for your interests and comment.
I'm beginning to feel that you might be misunderstanding
my message. Let me explain.
Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:13 +0900, Toshiharu Harada wrote:
A couple of years ago, we tried to build a tool to generate
SELinux policy
On Thu, Jun 14 2007, Carsten Otte wrote:
This patch removes xip_file_sendfile, the sendfile implementation for
xip without replacement. Those customers that use xip on s390 are not
using sendfile() as far as we know, and so far s390 is the only platform
this could potentially be used on so
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:24:32 -0400
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Linus and other Linux kernels might *want* to take other people's
improvements, but thanks to Richard Stallman's choices for GPLv3, they
can *not* legally take other people's improvements without violating
the GPLv3
I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe
that GPL3 is just GPL3 improved.
So - just throwing out the idea that if Linus is
unhappy with GPL3 that Linux lose the GPLx license
As a simple matter of fact, the *only* activities covered by the GPLv2
are copying, distributing and modifying. It says so in the license itself.
Unless I have explicitly installed linux myself in the box, I have
received the binary from them, so it can fall in the distribution
case.
--
Glauber
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 07:58:47AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
Hey, no point in CC'ing me twice! [EMAIL PROTECTED] works just fine as
well.
I'm sorry for it , jens. Now I resend the patch after remove some checkpatch.pl
warnings(line breaking trailing space).
If user have many cdrom
Hi,
I have the following strange behaviour with rtc_cmos:
$ echo 1181934240 /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy
$ rmmod rtc_cmos
$ modprobe rtc_cmos
$ echo 1181934240 /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
$ echo 1181934240 /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
bash:
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe
that GPL3 is just GPL3 improved.
So - just throwing out the idea that if Linus is
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:16:46AM -0400, Sean wrote:
There's no problem with people voicing honest disagreement with the v3,
but please lighten up a bit on FSF bashing and the Greek tragedy talk.
wry Would you prefer a reference to Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui? /wry
-
To unsubscribe from this
Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 23:22 +0900, Toshiharu Harada wrote:
2007/6/13, Stephen Smalley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:13 +0900, Toshiharu Harada wrote:
Here are examples:
/bin/bash process invoked from mingetty: /sbin/mingetty /bin/bash
/bin/bash process
Hi,
The Documentation/CodingStyle says:
Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.
Regards
dave
2007/6/15, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:48:36PM
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe
that GPL3 is
On 6/15/07, dave young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Documentation/CodingStyle says:
Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.
Regards
dave
2007/6/15, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Willy
On 6/15/07, Kevin Bowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
nothing like GPL2
Hi,
2007/6/15, debian developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And *Please* do not top-post!
I know gmail directly goes to the top while replying, but think of
other mail clients out there.
Yes, it go to the top directly, and tabs of pasted code will be
converted to white spaces, so I need use mutt to
On Friday 15 June 2007 02:29:32 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
As a simple matter of fact, the *only* activities covered by the GPLv2
are copying, distributing and modifying. It says so in the license
itself.
Unless I have explicitly installed linux myself in the box, I have
received
Hello,
I ran into some compilations problems with UML on the 2.6.22-rc4 kernel.
The problem turns up because paravirt.h is included in a couple of
headers in asm-i386 without being protected by a #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT.
I've attached a patch to fix this (i.e. UML compiles and runs fine for
me
On 15/06/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't you understand that the GPL v2 is a *software* license, it
doesn't cover hardware at all.
The GPLv2 is a copyright license not a software licence, indeed there is
no such thing as a 'software licence'. It deals with the circumstances
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 15:59:04 +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:33:08 +0200
Tino Keitel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have the following strange behaviour with rtc_cmos:
$ echo 1181934240 /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
bash: echo: write error: Device or
On 15/06/07, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, Daniel Hazelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Faulty logic. The hardware doesn't *restrict* you from *MODIFYING*
any fscking thing.
Ok, lemme try again:
case 2'': tivo provides source, end user tries to improve it, realizes
On Friday 15 June 2007 02:59:31 Jesper Juhl wrote:
snip
All quite valid reasons in my opinion.
and all wrong.
Look up the owning and controlling interests in Tivo and you'll find the
correct reason - stopping you doing evil things like keeping movies
you've recorded or uploading
Christoph Hellwig writes:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 04:36:09PM +0900, Kentaro Takeda wrote:
We limit the maximum length of any string data (such as
domainname and pathnames) to TOMOYO_MAX_PATHNAME_LEN
(which is 4000) bytes to fit within a single page.
Userland programs can obtain the amount of
On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:25:57 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Oliva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
And since the specific implementation involves creating a derived work
of the GPLed kernel (the signature, or the signed image, or
Hello,
+static int sm501_check_clocks(struct sm501_devdata *sm)
+{
+ unsigned long pwrmode = readl(sm-regs + SM501_CURRENT_CLOCK);
+ unsigned long msrc = (pwrmode SM501_POWERMODE_M_SRC);
+ unsigned long m1src = (pwrmode SM501_POWERMODE_M1_SRC);
+
+ return ((msrc == 0
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:38:41AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 15, 2007, Bron Gondwana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#define Dell CFG_FAVOURITE_VENDOR
A Dell desktop machine is a piece of hardware. The manufacturer has the
source code (hypothetically) to the BIOS. The BIOS is
Because GPLv2 doesn't enforce limitations on the hardware a GPL'd work can be
put on. It doesn't make artificial distinctions between Commercial,
Industrial and User. What it does is *ATTEMPT* to ensure that nobody
receiving a copy of a GPL'd work has the same rights as any other person
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:33:08 +0200
Tino Keitel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have the following strange behaviour with rtc_cmos:
$ echo 1181934240 /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy
$ rmmod rtc_cmos
$ modprobe rtc_cmos
$ echo 1181934240
On Friday 15 June 2007 01:08, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 14 June 2007 07:27:59 Bernd Paysan wrote:
Where is the boundary between hard- and software?
Software's the bit that's infinitely replicable at zero cost. Hardware
tends not to be.
There's no zero cost for software replication,
On Friday 8 June 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
Model Number: HITACHI HTS541680J9SA00
Serial Number: SB**I57L4A
This one is already blacklisted in the windows drivers.
I have the same problem with this drive (shipped with a Thinkpad Z61m):
Model Number: HITACHI
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Michael Poole wrote:
If the DRM signature and program executable are coupled such that
they are not useful when separated, the implication to me is that
they form one work that is based on the original Program. This is
On Friday 15 June 2007 04:19, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I will state one more time: I think that what Tivo did was and is:
(a) perfectly legal wrt the GPLv2 (and I have shown multiple times why
your arguments don't hold logical water - if you actually followed
them yourself, you
On Thursday 14 June 2007 19:20, Paulo Marques wrote:
Watching the output of the first grep without wc -l shows that,
although it is not 100% accurate, it is still ok just to get a rough
estimate.
So yes, ~6300 files are definitely more than a couple ;)
Most of them don't say anything, so
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:44 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
Agreed. I said I wasn't going to argue about it because there *ARE*
distinctions that the law makes and the GPL ignores. You can't have it both
ways. If the module is distributed *with* the kernel *SOURCE* then it doesn't
matter if
Hello.
I just now made demo movies how TOMOYO Linux looks like.
http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/data/CentOS5-install.avi is
a movie that demonstrates how to install TOMOYO Linux 1.4.1 on CentOS 5.
http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/data/CentOS5-learning.avi is
a movie that demonstrates how the TOMOYO
Hello,
here my first proposal for LinuxPPS implemented with new specific
syscalls.
I'd like some comments before sending a definitive patch. :)
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Device Driver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:59 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9b01bd5b284bbf519b726b39f1352023cb5e9e69
Commit: 9b01bd5b284bbf519b726b39f1352023cb5e9e69
Parent:
On Thursday 14 June 2007 20:55, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
It does not matter. GPL v2 and later can be reduced to v2 by
recepient.
And expanded by the next recipient to GPLv2 or later, as long as the first
recipient does not make a substantial modification (substantial is a
copyright term - there
On Jun 13 2007 12:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general we think, that also for Linux it is a good thing to have
documentation for the most important kernel/driver messages. Even
kernel hackers not always are aware of the meaning of kernel messages
for components, which they don't know in
David Schwartz wrote :
The GPL is about having the legal right to modify the software and
being
able to put other people's distributed improvements back into the
original code base. It does not guarantee that you will actually be
able
to modify the software and get it to work on some
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:37 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
For many juridisctions loading from disk into memory is copying and in
some from memory to CPU cache a second copy. This is one reason as I
understand it GPLv3 talks about
On Jun 13 2007 12:04, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 20:18 +0200, holzheu wrote:
But they unfortunately do not solve our problem. We need an identifier
for a documented message in order to find the right description for a
message.
I believe it better to simply add __FILE__ __LINE__
15 Haz 2007 Cum tarihinde, Eric W. Biederman şunları yazmıştı:
Sight unseen I'm guessing that you have a kexec aware distro that is doing
something in the runlevel change scripts and thus unloading the kernel.
What do: /sys/kernel/kexec_loaded and /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_loaded say?
Not sure,
From: Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
the comment sys_quotactl seems to be 32/64bit clean, enable it for
From: Vasily Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
the comment sys_quotactl seems to be 32/64bit clean, enable it for
On Friday 15 June 2007 00:36, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
A hundred or so messages back someone stated that the parport driver in
Linux is GPLv1.1
Probably a misinterpretation - there are comments in the parport driver
mentioning the GFDL version 1.1. If you just grep through, you might think
it's
Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the current checkpatch.pl script rejects this notion and requires
that you use tabs whenever you can (you can still align code within
the length of one tab).
Tool deficiency.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Haavard Skinnemoen :
As Jan Altenberg pointed out, line_length will always be 0 if
bits_per_pixel 8. Fix this and also make sure that we round up to
the nearest byte.
Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
I haven't tested this with any real program that uses the frame buffer,
From: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixes STN LCD support for the atmel_lcdfb framebuffer driver.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This patch is the result of a work from Jan Altenberg and has
been tested on a Hitachi SP06Q002 on at91sam9261ek.
It adds a Kconfig switch
On Friday 15 June 2007 04:25:24 David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:44 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
Agreed. I said I wasn't going to argue about it because there *ARE*
distinctions that the law makes and the GPL ignores. You can't have it
both ways. If the module is distributed
On 15-06-2007 08:52, debian developer wrote:
...
Even if it's just a name change, it will be a different license and
requires the
agreement of all authors. It's much easier( not that we want to) to go
to GPLv3 than
go to LKL.
Doing bad things is usually much easier than good things.
After
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 09:44 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:59 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9b01bd5b284bbf519b726b39f1352023cb5e9e69
Commit:
On Jun 14 2007 18:32, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
markus reichelt wrote:
PS: Just wondering: Who came up with this on-demand hype?
I don't remember the names, but i remember the root causes. Here we go:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/86
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Jun 14 2007 14:52, markus reichelt wrote:
* Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read that now loop devices are being created on demand, which
obviously (still) not works
yes, someone thought this was a good idea :(
It *is* a good idea. MD works that way too.
Jan
--
-
To
From: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adds STN LCD support on at91sam9261ek. Uses a black and
white screen from Hitachi : SP06Q002.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Submitted in linux-fbdev for a RFC but will make its way
through the AT91 maintainer.
Relies on the
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:23:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course there is. The seeks are reduced since there are an factor
of 16 less metadata blocks. fsck does not read files. It just reads
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:58:20PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
Certainly. But the raid doesn't need to be tightly integrated
into the filesystem to achieve this. The filesystem need only know
the geometry of the RAID and when it comes to write, it tries to write
full stripes at a time.
XFS
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 10:50 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
From: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixes STN LCD support for the atmel_lcdfb framebuffer driver.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Jan Altenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Cyrill wrote:
err = foo(arg_a, arg_b, arg_c,
arg_d);
1234
(note: monospace font needed)
Dave wrote:
The Documentation/CodingStyle says:
Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
used for indentation, and the above
2) I don't know how the FSF is approaching the Linux developers, but
what I've been personally trying to do in this infinite thread was
mainly to set the record straight that v3 did not change the spirit of
the license, like some have claimed.
The FSF have certainly tried to talk to me a bit
On 6/15/07, Bernd Petrovitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Says the one without real name who is full quoting including even the
mailing list footers.
hmm. including footers was a mistake. sigh!
but i really dont understand why the real name is needed unless im
submitting some patches!
What's in
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 04:58 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
If the module is distributed 'as a separate work', _then_ what you say
is true: the only reason you'd have a right to the source is if the
module is considered a 'derivative work'.
But when you distribute the same module as part
On Friday 15 June 2007 02:24:37 Michael Gerdau wrote:
Because GPLv2 doesn't enforce limitations on the hardware a GPL'd work
can be put on. It doesn't make artificial distinctions between
Commercial, Industrial and User. What it does is *ATTEMPT* to
ensure that nobody receiving a copy of a
Jared Hulbert wrote:
An alternative approach, which does not need to have struct page at
hand, would be to use the nopfn vm operations struct. That one would
have to rely on get_xip_pfn.
Of course! Okay now I'm begining to understand.
Sorry, but I think I was educated yesterday that -fault()
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:46:04PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
--- /dev/null 2007-03-13 19:15:28.862769062 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.21logfs/fs/logfs/gc.c 2007-06-03 19:18:57.0 +0200
Number of bugs in case of error looks quite sad...
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:17 +0530, debian developer wrote:
[...]
And *Please* do not top-post!
Says the one without real name who is full quoting including even the
mailing list footers.
SCNR,
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156
A Tivo box is a collection of literary works protected by copyright,
designs protected by design patents and copyright, names and logos
protected by trademarks, functionalities protected by patents and many
more things. These are the things that restrict what I may do with it
and how
Luca wrote:
Got it!
The emulator skips the writeback if the old value is unchanged, so the
apic doesn't see the write.
Forcing the writeback:
- if ((d Mov) || (dst.orig_val != dst.val)) {
- if ((d Mov) || (dst.orig_val != dst.val) || isxchg) {
seems to fix the issue :D I'm
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:58 -0700, Ollie Wild wrote:
A good heuristic, though, might be to limit
argument size to a percentage (say 25%) of maximum stack size and
validate this inside copy_strings().
This seems to do:
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/exec.c | 17
On Friday 15 June 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Only on i386. I think you just broke ppc32-on-ppc64.
Indeed... I'm pretty sure the 64 bits quantity will be naturally aligned
on ppc32 (and possibly others).
Ok, I'll bite. I've been telling people for ages what the right solution
On Friday 15 June 2007 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you cannot modify the software that runs on your Tivo hardware you
haven't tried very hard.
Yes, but the GPLv2 clearly says that you don't have to try very hard. The
preferred form of modification has to be distributed. I can run a
On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:47, David Schwartz wrote:
The GPL does not require it to be easy in fact to modify the piece of
software.
Yes it does, section 3: The source code for a work means the preferred form
of the work for making modifications to it. It then even lists that you
need to
SCSI marks internal commands with REQ_PREEMPT and push it at the front
of the request queue using blk_execute_rq(). When entering suspended
or frozen state, SCSI devices are quiesced using
scsi_device_quiesce(). In quiesced state, only REQ_PREEMPT requests
are processed. This is how SCSI blocks
Linus,
Please pull from the repository and branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git for-linus
to get a fix for a fairly critical bug which allows, under certain conditions,
guest fpu state to find its way into the host fpu.
Avi Kivity (1):
KVM: Prevent guest
From: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:31:37 +0200
One common problem with 32 bit system call and ioctl emulation
is the different alignment rules between i386 and 64 bit machines.
A number of drivers work around this by marking the compat
structures as
One common problem with 32 bit system call and ioctl emulation
is the different alignment rules between i386 and 64 bit machines.
A number of drivers work around this by marking the compat
structures as 'attribute((packed))', which is not the right
solution because it breaks all the non-x86
On Friday 15 June 2007 05:30:09 Bernd Paysan wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you cannot modify the software that runs on your Tivo hardware you
haven't tried very hard.
Yes, but the GPLv2 clearly says that you don't have to try very hard. The
preferred form
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
I have met such devices already, we are fixing their report descriptors
on the fly before they enter the HID parser. I will prepare a patch for
you to test (probably tomorrow, sorry).
Islam,
please try the patch below (against 2.6.22-rc4) and send me
Justin Piszcz wrote:
That's strange, I guess different chipsets 'chew' up different amounts
of memory OR you have your DVT(?) (video-card memory/aperature) set to
256MB? I have mine set to 128MB, in top:
Mem: 8039576k total, 6187304k used, 1852272k free, 696k buffers
Me:
Mem:
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
Now for a different PoV:
Do I think Tivoisation is bad for the community ?
Of course I think it is but your mileage may vary.
And I happen to agree with you. What I disagree with is taking steps to
make bad == illegal. I also have a problem with doing things that force
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Thanks for testing, Pim. Glad it works for you.
The pleasure was all on my side.
Keep an eye out for BIOS upgrades, the next version might fix it.
What, are you going to report this to GigaByte?
Thanks,
Pim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Nice three documents with many numbers:
http://blogs.sun.com/ontherecord/entry/now_available_three_new_solaris
kloczek
--
---
*Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają*
On Friday 15 June 2007 05:17:44 David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 04:58 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
If the module is distributed 'as a separate work', _then_ what you say
is true: the only reason you'd have a right to the source is if the
module is considered a 'derivative
On Friday 15 June 2007 07:24, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:19PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
So, you see, your statement above, about wanting to be able to use
other people's improvements, cannot be taken without qualification.
No. Linus and other Linux kernels might
by your argument, the user has some right to modify the
software, on
that piece of hardware it bought which had free software on it,
correct?
Yes. This means the hardware distributor who put the software in
there must not place roadblocks that impede the user to get where she
wants with
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:01:48 +0400, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
OpenVZ Linux kernel team has discovered the problem
with 32bit quota tools working on 64bit architectures.
In 2.6.10 kernel sys32_quotactl() function was replaced by sys_quotactl() with
the comment sys_quotactl seems to be 32/64bit
Hello
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:40:56 +0300 Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
Randy Dunlap wrote:
while running fsx-linux on x86_64 system:
thanks, I will take a look.
Is it reproducible? If yes, would you please try on some earlier kernel?
I ran the test 8 more
You can find a half-year back discussions of this patch:
First attempt: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/19/123
Second attempt: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/25/57
I think they will answer your questions.
Thank you,
Vasily
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:03 +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:44:29PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
--- /dev/null 2007-03-13 19:15:28.862769062 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.21logfs/fs/logfs/dir.c 2007-06-03 19:54:55.0 +0200
...
+static int __logfs_dir_walk(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
+
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:38:46PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually
seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of
code at once. An I thought I was the only wimp around.
Again, anyone
On Friday 15 June 2007 06:18:59 David Greaves wrote:
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
Now for a different PoV:
Do I think Tivoisation is bad for the community ?
Of course I think it is but your mileage may vary.
And I happen to agree with you. What I disagree with is taking steps to
make bad ==
On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14 15:55:26.0
+0400
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
...
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_IA64)
+/*
+ * This code works
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 06:03 -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
In other words, it applies to *SECTIONS* of the code, not to individual
object
code files. This is why kernel modules can have their own, separate license
from the kernel. It isn't until the code is shipped as a *standard* part of
On 15/06/07, Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
by your argument, the user has some right to modify the
software, on
that piece of hardware it bought which had free software on it,
correct?
Yes. This means the hardware distributor who put the software in
there must not place
On Friday 15 June 2007 06:02:11 Bernd Paysan wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007 07:24, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:19PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
So, you see, your statement above, about wanting to be able to use
other people's improvements, cannot be taken without
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:43 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14
15:55:26.0 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
...
+#if
On Jun 11 2007 13:51, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
(yay, 3.09 bogomips and a totally incapable processor :p)
Have not tried more recent kernels yet though.
Too bad I don't still have access to the 0.59 bogomips double sigma
386 machine that had the dubious honor of being the
SCSI marks internal commands with REQ_PREEMPT and push it at the front
of the request queue using blk_execute_rq(). When entering suspended
or frozen state, SCSI devices are quiesced using
scsi_device_quiesce(). In quiesced state, only REQ_PREEMPT requests
are processed. This is how SCSI blocks
On Fri, June 15, 2007 10:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 14 2007 14:52, markus reichelt wrote:
* Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read that now loop devices are being created on demand, which
obviously (still) not works
yes, someone thought this was a good idea :(
It *is* a good idea.
1 - 100 of 1293 matches
Mail list logo
