On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:45:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On 11 Apr 2007 00:56:51 +0200
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a much more complete patchkit for this that gets reposted
regularly on l-k. Perhaps it would make sense to test that first?
adaptive readahead? Has
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 03:56:59PM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 schrieb Sascha Warner:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some rare
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 05:27:38AM +0100, Sascha Warner wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
do right now 8)
Have a nice day~~~ It works!
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc1-mm1/mm/mmap.c
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:57:31AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
I keep forgetting to check that you are on the cc. My email client
loves dropping you from the to/cc list.
hehe, sorry for my crappy smtp server ;)
Fengguang Wu wrote:
The proportional set size (PSS) of a process is the count of
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:27:46PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
Or maybe it's my SMTP server's problem
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:00:15AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
between headers and MUAs,
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads?
Could be. It'd help heaps if we knew which patch in -mm caused
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads
Hi Balbir,
[add CC to LKML]
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
Or maybe it's my SMTP server's problem. Email systems are complex.
Thats a valid point. It would be interesting to see what the overcommit
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:19:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Great! So the problem might have existed for some time, but we never
saw it due to default over commit values? Were you using these values
for over commit even before?
No I changed it several weeks ago to stop my desktop from
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:21:43PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
[Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
| Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
| shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
| do right now 8)
|
|
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:18:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
Most of the code suggests that it is valid to insert a NULL item,
possibly a zero item with pointer cast. However, in __lookup_slot()
whether or not the slot is found seems to depend on the actual value
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 08:54:44AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Wu Fengguang wrote:
Collect info about the global available memory and its consumption speed.
The data are used by the stateful method to estimate the thrashing
threshold.
Looks like you should use
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:18:40PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> >Most of the code suggests that it is valid to insert a NULL item,
> >possibly a zero item with pointer cast. However, in __lookup_slot()
> >whether or not the slot is found seems to depend on the actual
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 08:54:44AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>
> > Collect info about the global available memory and its consumption speed.
> > The data are used by the stateful method to estimate the thrashing
> > thresh
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:45:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2007 00:56:51 +0200
> Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There's a much more complete patchkit for this that gets reposted
> > regularly on l-k. Perhaps it would make sense to test that first?
>
> adaptive
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:00:15AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
> between
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >> Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads?
> >>
> >
> > Could be. It'd help heaps if we knew which
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > &g
Hi Balbir,
[add CC to LKML]
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
Or maybe it's my SMTP server's problem. Email systems are complex.
> >>> Thats a valid point. It would be interesting to see what the overcommit
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:19:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Great! So the problem might have existed for some time, but we never
> > > saw it due to default over commit values? Were you using these values
> > > for over commit even before?
> >
> > No I changed it several weeks ago to stop my
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:21:43PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
> | Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
> | shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
> | do right now 8)
> |
>
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
> shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
> do right now 8)
Have a nice day~~~ It works!
> ---
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:57:31AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> I keep forgetting to check that you are on the cc. My email client
> loves dropping you from the to/cc list.
hehe, sorry for my crappy smtp server ;)
> Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > The "proportional set size" (PSS) of a process is the
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:27:46PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
> >
> >
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 03:56:59PM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 schrieb Sascha Warner:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
> > pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 05:27:38AM +0100, Sascha Warner wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
> >> pdflush often using 100%
Applied, thanks!
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:42:55PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
Add code for touch-alloc.
And Change read memory to write memory to avoid use the zero-page for
reads in do_anonymous_page.
Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu
---
usemem.c | 34 ++
1 file changed, 22
Applied, thanks!
32 matches
Mail list logo
